Riven said:
Without opening each individual map though, what ought to be the process to validate them before reinstating them with their records?
If you're talking about 'what should qualify'...
Trying to avoid repacks if possible (most repackers, like 17buddies, will pollute the archive with their own README) but if that's the only thing we can find they should probably be marked as such.
As in how everyone should be to contribute?
Well considering the volume of maps - this is a huge undertaking. I thought about running curl and just spamming the 'report missing link' php request but I'm not sure that'll help any of you administrators get them fixed either - you'd still have dig through archive.org or alternative sites for 1500+ files, many of which we don't know the filename of either if they weren't direct-links.
If I could snap my fingers, I'd have a site up and running where people could select from a list of maps considered missing and submit a working URL, which could then get checked by an administrator. Crowd-sourcing this would be the answer to the volume of missing files.
This weekend I may have some more things to show in that regard. Will keep you all posted.