Re: Philosophizers
Posted by Bewbies on
Wed Mar 8th 2006 at 10:37pm
Posted
2006-03-08 10:37pm
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
kinda funny. i once speculated with my teacher about particle placement and digitization.. i mean taking, let's say, a human being and recording it's being digitally.. then storing it just like any other data. (you know, so you could transport and reconstruct it elsewhere.)
of course, someone else jumped in, inquiring about the fact that there would then be two beings. one has to die. and that hit me real hard.. i had to think about it. when i think of philosphy's role in science, i think of that time.
Re: Philosophizers
Posted by FatStrings on
Thu Mar 9th 2006 at 2:37am
1242 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 11th 2005
Occupation: Architecture Student
Location: USA
i guess i was a little extreme in this, but what i was trying to say is
that people are coming more and more to want physical/scientific proof
before they believe anything
Re: Philosophizers
Posted by Foxpup on
Fri Mar 10th 2006 at 5:25am
Foxpup
member
380 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 26th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: the Land of Oz
A philosopher is someone who doesn't have a real job so they tell people how to live their lives.
Wait a minute. I don't have a real job.
Two words: food and sex
Better to be in denial than to be human.
Bill Gates understands binary: his company is number one, and his customers are all zeros.