Should I give Source another shot?

After the massive failure that was Bloody Ore I abandoned HL2
completely, but recently I grew bored with HL1 mapping, and dusted off
Source to give it another shot. I'm making a map set in a mine like
Bloody Ore was, but this one will not fail. It's already a good size
and still takes only five minutes for a full compile, because aside
from a small topside area, everything else is underground.

My question to you, is do you want me to post it here, on the Pit, or
reserve a space on my hard drive for it and never let it see the light
of day?

---

I'm allergic to tequila, it makes me break out in felonies.

Post it up, it can only be made better with feedback, right?

---

Blame it on Microsoft, God does.

You've already accomplished more than most of us as far as making an effort toward HL2 editing.

I think you're being a bit to hard on yourself.

Go for it.

---

The best things in life, aren't things.

Go ahead and post 'er up, I'd love to take a look at it.

We all make mistakes, I could show you some of my early maps, those were some of the worst maps in history. :smile:

---

Dark_Kilauea
DVS Administration
http://www.dvstudio-production.com/

IT IS DONE: Bloody Ore 2's thread

Thanks for helping me decide, and hopefully I won't let this map get out of hand and become unplayable like I did Bloody Ore

---

I'm allergic to tequila, it makes me break out in felonies.

go for it!

---

Why snark works.