Dang, getting all up in ma business aren't we?
The Raid controller is supporting 3 1TB cards in a RAID 5, my board only goes to 4 AFAIK or would be much slower than a dedicated RAID controller. My OS drive is separate of that and not part of the RAID. My OS drive is connected to the board directly instead, It's a VR 10,000rpm 280GB drive.
Well, a new update to my RMA says I've been declined. My 8800GTS was registered, but not within the 30 days since I bought it back in 2007. Oh well, looks like I'm getting two 560 Ti SC cards.
Here's a question though: I noticed that a lot of these new video cards also include a mini-HDMI port (or a regular one, or both), but I've read Nvidia cards can only run any two connections at one time and that's all. Theoretically, If I plug up a dvi-hdmi cable and hook my third monitor up to the same card, all three could be supported by the SLI all the time, but I'm guessing the that won't be possible anyway.
I still have my working 7800GT, that's a single card slot (and what I'm currently running on atm). I won't be able to fit it, but If I could, that would be great for use as a PhysX card like you said, no?
Crono said:
Doing it once when you're going to play games, then turning it off when you're done seems like not a big thing to me. There's likely something more tedious you do more often for other things that you're just not paying attention to.
An example of something more tedious would be me checking my e-mails, or switching my sound output to headphone mode when I want good sound out of my headphones. -Which usually happens when I'm about to play a game, so as not to wake my roommate late at night. [it would switch automatically, but I'm not plugging it into the board, it gets plugged into my front right speaker]. I'd have to buy a male to female TRS cable to make it as easy plugging in. (the headphones have a mic attached and the cable splits at the end to accommodate both peripherals).
So in that camp I feel you're right, turning it on and off isn't the issue, It's more like me loosing one of my monitors while playing a game. I guess I'll get over it.
Crono said:
Well, first and foremost, you want the majority of monitors on the primary card ... there is NO reason not to do it this way. You're just making things difficult if you don't.
So, unless there's something graphically intense being demanded on the second monitor, the first will be delivered all the computing effort? I always thought, the more pixels, the more strain, regardless of what was being processed. Unless if there is nothing but a still image, or word processor being displayed on the second, the card can deliver the most effort to where it's being demanded.
Thanks for all the help Crono, and of course: Orph and tnkqwe. I think getting the two 560s and having them in SLI will be a worthy graphics solution that should last me at least another 4-5 years. And longer if I freaking remember to register them in-time.
Blog:
www.playingarchitecture.net
LinkedIn:
Eric Lancon
Twitter:
@Riven202