I'm stating things how I always do and I'm not going to change the way I type or talk, no conforming, sorry.
I hate the term "in my opinion", it sounds self-important.
As if to tell the person reading it that what they're reading is more important then what they think. I know that's not how it's meant, but most times at least in the context it's used, it comes across that way.
People 'read' words differently I suppose.
I won't even start on the "keep trying" crap numerous people tell me, this happens face to face as well.
I don't care how 'bold' my posts sound and frankly the amount nit picking that is done to my posts is starting to piss me off.
No offense to anyone.
Most of my posts are read into far too much; much farther then what's there and in return assumptions are made about what I said.
Here's an example:
just because the movie was superb, doesn't make it better than a book, thats impossible, because a 2 hour flick cannot encompass a 300-600 page book.. sorry its not the same.
I never said that. So, what did you respond to?
I mean, it looks like you're directing the statement towards me ... if not, if it's just a statement, that's different, it's just unclear ?
My words aren't literary and have no grounds for analysis. So, please, only take them for what they say. :smile:
Also, books and movies shouldn't be measured in the same light; they're different formats for one.
Secondly, a book allows complete and utter control to at least one person, a film does not. I don't know when people (in general) are going to realize that.
What is the point of making something in a different format if it is exactly like what it came from? That shows no effort from the people who worked on it, no creation, nothing. There are examples of when this is done and they're terrible (The Great Gatsby).
[lastly]
I'm just being honest.
So, don't look at this as if I'm trying to hurt someone or piss someone off.
Also, I'm not picking on you, Orph :smile: