Test

Test

Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 12:15pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-05 12:15pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
Some images in this post have been automatically down-sized, click on them to view the full sized versions:

User posted image
Re: Test Posted by Orpheus on Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 2:03pm
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2004-12-05 2:03pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
very nice.

sets up candles to burn

/me prepares to sing, but notices glares from other pit members.

ahem

very nice indeed.
Re: Test Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 2:26pm
7dk2h4md720ih
1976 posts
Posted 2004-12-05 2:26pm
1976 posts 198 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 9th 2001
I'm not very artistically inclined, which is why I refrained from
commenting on your other picture. I can pick out a couple of things
though, which I feel may need more work. The sword needs to be more
defined. I realise the style you're using doesn't lend itself to
well-defined objects, but the edges look too rough. The hood or helmet
on his head lacks any real depth, and the texture seems strange (which
is why I can't determine why it's a hood or helmet). The left side of
his collar doesn't look near as nice as his right.

The way the eyes are done, and the way the armour fades into black both
look excellent. This is a hundred times better than anything I could
create, so my criticisms don't hold much weight.
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 7:10pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-05 7:10pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
This was acctully my first picture ever with photoshop :razz: but thanx for the nice feedback.

Oh and I totally agree with you on all your points, but as I said this was the first, and I would like to keep it like it was, so I can look back at it :smile:
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 1:40pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 1:40pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
Some images in this post have been automatically down-sized, click on them to view the full sized versions:

Heres another one of my pictures... :leper:

User posted image
Re: Test Posted by ReNo on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 1:51pm
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 1:51pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
A fan of fantasy art I guess :razz: I really like that new picture,
particularly the dragon's head which I think is shaded really nicely
and has a real sense of depth. Teeth look a bit dodgy though - I'd have
imagined a dragon might have some more significant ones in there
somewhere! The fireball doesn't look bad but could be better -
unfortunately I'm not artistic enough to suggest how. Very good
job though, pretty impressive picture!
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 2:00pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 2:00pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
<SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB"><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p>
Thx Reno. Actually my friend said the fire looks like vanilla or something... but hey, fire is so damn hard to make convincing! Both Pepper and Grimloch made a very good job though, especially Grimlock :smile:

</o:p></SPAN>
</SPAN>
Re: Test Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 5:04pm
7dk2h4md720ih
1976 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 5:04pm
1976 posts 198 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 9th 2001
Tha flames lack depth and look very two-dimesnional when comapred with
the dragons head. The mans position on the dragons back is a little
strange, as someone sitting the way he is would usually turn their head
and turn their torso only slightly if at all.
Re: Test Posted by ReNo on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 5:29pm
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 5:29pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
The spear doesn't look a fitting weapon for him either - a demon thing of his stature should surely have something a bit more ornate!
Re: Test Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 7:55pm
Pvt.Scythe
730 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 7:55pm
730 posts 113 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 19th 2004 Occupation: student Location: Finland
When doing flames search for something you can use as a reference. Also the jaw is too short. And the wings could be little more detailed. Nevertheless great work. For drawing tutorials and quality fantasy art visit http://www.elfwood.com. Check out FARP on that site.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 10:16pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 10:16pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
You might want to creat a light source on your dragon's face that is coming from the fire. It will make it look awesome if you do that.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 10:30pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 10:30pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Spartan 34 said:
You might want to creat a light source on your dragon's face that is coming from the fire. It will make it look awesome if you do that.
Actually, by the amount of fire that's there and the length of the dragons jaws, it wouldn't illuminate the face very much, if at all.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 11:02pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-07 11:02pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
I just want to note some human proportions here instead of starting a new thread. I've done some reading and measuring myself and these are proportions anybody can use when drawing humans or anthro.

1) Body is about 7 heads high from the bottom of the feet to the top of the shoulders.

2) Waiste is slightly less wide than shoulders

3) arms are shorter than legs

4) when standing up finger tips reach down past the waiste and about half way to the knees

5) hands are shorter than feet

6) the upper part of the arm is the same length as the lower part of the arm.

7) the upper part of the leg is the same length as the lower part of the leg.

P.S. If you see any proportional errors in these notes let me know.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 3:54am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 3:54am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Spartan 34 said:
I just want to note some human proportions here instead of starting a new thread. I've done some reading and measuring myself and these are proportions anybody can use when drawing humans or anthro.

1) Body is about 7 heads high from the bottom of the feet to the top of the shoulders.

2) Waiste is slightly less wide than shoulders

3) arms are shorter than legs

4) when standing up finger tips reach down past the waiste and about half way to the knees

5) hands are shorter than feet

6) the upper part of the arm is the same length as the lower part of the arm.

7) the upper part of the leg is the same length as the lower part of the leg.

P.S. If you see any proportional errors in these notes let me know.
Yeah, those are superhero proportions, a normal person is only about 5 heads tall.

Face:
The face has an eye line half way between top and bottom. Nose line is half way between the eye line and bottom.
Mouth line is half way between nose line and bottom.
Hair line is a little above half way between top and eye line.
The face is vertically cut in five equal pieces.
Two "chunks" are the eyes (figure out which ones).
The middle of the eye (iris) lines up with the outer corners of the mouth.
The inner edge of the eyes line up with the outer nostrils of the nose.
The top of the ears are at the same height as the eye brows (Or slightly above, some people look funny, now you know why).

Hands:
Wrists lay slightly below waste line.
The size of a hand is about the same size as the face (Fingers and all).
There are THREE muscle areas in the hand (Not including fingers).

Other Crap:
The width of shoulders is about 1-1.5 head on each side (Man). 3/4s-1 head on each side (Woman).

Just to name some more.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 10:41am
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 10:41am
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
Actually the body is more like 6 to 6 1/2 heads high. 7 head is a little high but five is too short. For some f**ked up reason though sometimes you can get a good looking figure with 5 heads high and sometimes 7 heads.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 7:27pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 7:27pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
Well I did some more measuring and read up on human proportions some more and it seems that the average is 5 heads high. Also I'd like to state that for males the shoulders are about 2 heads wide and for females the shoulders are about 1.5 heads wide.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 7:31pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 7:31pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Spartan 34 said:
Well I did some more measuring and read up on human proportions some more and it seems that the average is 5 heads high. Also I'd like to state that for males the shoulders are about 2 heads wide and for females the shoulders are about 1.5 heads wide.
Right, I couldn't remember which it was. I think it's closer to 1.5 for men and 1 for women. Because, seriously, 2 head width on EACH side. That's huge. It's about one now that I think about it. (It's been a very long time since I had art :sad: )

I'll edit it.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 7:51pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 7:51pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting Crono</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting Spartan 34</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>Well I did some more measuring and read up on human proportions some more and it seems that the average is 5 heads high. Also I'd like to state that for males the shoulders are about 2 heads wide and for females the shoulders are about 1.5 heads wide.
</DIV></DIV>

Right, I couldn't remember which it was. I think it's closer to 1.5 for men and 1 for women. Because, seriously, 2 head width on EACH side. </DIV></DIV>

Think about what you just said. If a woman's shoulders were the width of one head then she'd look like a snake.

Edit: I found this picture on the web showing the human figure being 7 heads high as I stated before. This looks like the proper heighth for a human but at the same time so does 5 heads high. It's driving me crazy.

User posted image
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 8:19pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 8:19pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
I told you! 7 heads is for a SUPER-HERO or comic books in general. They have mis proportioned sizes everywhere. It is five heads high for a realistic drawing.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 8:24pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 8:24pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
Ok so I've been doing some MORE research and measuring and I have come to a conclusion. Go with 5.5 if you want your person to look perfect. This is how I am going to be doing it from now on. 5 and 7 can also be good if you are doing something a little different. 7 would be used for something like a villian in a comic book and five would be used for a normal person who is having to carry a lot of stuff or is being weighed down by something they are carry such as armor.
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 9:15pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 9:15pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
Man! You guys take this rather seriously, don't you? :biggrin: <?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" /><v:shapetype id=_x0000_t75 stroked="f" filled="f" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" coordsize="21600,21600"><v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:connecttype="rect" gradientshapeok="t" o:extrusionok="f"></v:path><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></o:lock></v:shapetype><o:p></o:p>

I don?t think that getting the "character?s" right height is hard, I never think so much about it... I go entirely on "feeling" :razz: <o:p></o:p>

It's the hands, feet and legs I'm worried about! Does anyone have like a tut or something? Would be very aprishiated! <o:p></o:p>
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 10:41pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 10:41pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
If Lep would open up a tutorial section on drawing I'd gladly write some tuts. You can't go on feeling or you'll mess up. It's always good to draw everything ahead of time lightly and to draw up a skeleton (stick figure drawn really lightly) first of the person and then build off of that. It will make everything look better and you'll notice your proportions are more accurate.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 11:08pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-08 11:08pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Kanniball said:
Man! You guys take this rather seriously, don't you? :biggrin:

I don?t think that getting the "character?s" right height is hard, I never think so much about it... I go entirely on "feeling" :razz:

It's the hands, feet and legs I'm worried about! Does anyone have like a tut or something? Would be very aprishiated!
Read my post on the previous page it talks about hands.
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Thu Dec 9th 2004 at 1:15pm
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-09 1:15pm
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
Yeah but I mean the actual form of the hand while you are holding something!

Although, knowing there are three musceles (as you wrote) it makes it a little easier.

Oh and Spartan, I always mess up when I'm doing skeletons for my characters, Everything gets wrong :razz:
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Thu Dec 9th 2004 at 6:29pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-09 6:29pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
This is okay for drawing nice looking hands. However, if you want some detailed hands you have to create a more detailed skeleton.

Actually, this site has pretty good tutorials on proportions FOR ANIME ONLY. (thus everything is very disproportioned.)
Re: Test Posted by Kanniball on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 11:26am
Kanniball
29 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 11:26am
29 posts 3 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 4th 2004 Location: Sweden
Thx for the link Crono. :smile:
Re: Test Posted by Myrk- on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:09pm
Myrk-
2299 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 9:09pm
Myrk-
member
2299 posts 604 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 12th 2002 Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician Location: Plymouth, UK
I don't like your use of photoshop filters in your pictures, looks a bit crummy.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:51pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 9:51pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
I don't think I'll ever use PSP to color my pictures except for maybe on a few occasions. I like the old fashioned way of prismas and paint.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:56pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 9:56pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Prisma what? Colored Pencils, Markers, Oil Paint? Amongst the other twelve billion products they make.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 10:20pm
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 10:20pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
Sorry about the confusion. Whenever I say prismas I always mean the prisma colored pencils. I love those things. Freakin box of 120 cost me $100. Those damn things are expensive.
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 10:38pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-10 10:38pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
I got the 120 pack for like 75% off :smile: (Go company discounts)
Re: Test Posted by Foxpup on Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 6:35am
Foxpup
380 posts
Posted 2004-12-13 6:35am
Foxpup
member
380 posts 38 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 26th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: the Land of Oz
You paid a hundred bucks for 120 pencils?!? Are they really, really good pencils or something? I think Faber-Castell watercolour pencils are the way to go. It's pencil and paint all in one cheap, thin, wooden rod.
Re: Test Posted by Spartan on Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 10:59am
Spartan
1204 posts
Posted 2004-12-13 10:59am
Spartan
member
1204 posts 409 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 28th 2004
Crono I might just have to give you my mailing address. :smile:
Re: Test Posted by Crono on Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 8:36pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-12-13 8:36pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
can't get them that cheap anymore. :sad:

It was like ... 4 years ago when I got them.