Re: Test
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 2:03pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
very nice.
sets up candles to burn
/me prepares to sing, but notices glares from other pit members.
ahem
very nice indeed.
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
I'm not very artistically inclined, which is why I refrained from
commenting on your other picture. I can pick out a couple of things
though, which I feel may need more work. The sword needs to be more
defined. I realise the style you're using doesn't lend itself to
well-defined objects, but the edges look too rough. The hood or helmet
on his head lacks any real depth, and the texture seems strange (which
is why I can't determine why it's a hood or helmet). The left side of
his collar doesn't look near as nice as his right.
The way the eyes are done, and the way the armour fades into black both
look excellent. This is a hundred times better than anything I could
create, so my criticisms don't hold much weight.
Re: Test
Posted by Kanniball on
Sun Dec 5th 2004 at 7:10pm
29 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 4th 2004
Location: Sweden
This was acctully my first picture ever with photoshop :razz: but thanx for the nice feedback.
Oh and I totally agree with you on all your points, but as I said this was the first, and I would like to keep it like it was, so I can look back at it :smile:
Re: Test
Posted by ReNo on
Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 1:51pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
A fan of fantasy art I guess :razz: I really like that new picture,
particularly the dragon's head which I think is shaded really nicely
and has a real sense of depth. Teeth look a bit dodgy though - I'd have
imagined a dragon might have some more significant ones in there
somewhere! The fireball doesn't look bad but could be better -
unfortunately I'm not artistic enough to suggest how. Very good
job though, pretty impressive picture!
Re: Test
Posted by Kanniball on
Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 2:00pm
29 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 4th 2004
Location: Sweden
<SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB"><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p>
Thx Reno. Actually my friend said the fire looks like vanilla or something... but hey, fire is so damn hard to make convincing! Both Pepper and Grimloch made a very good job though, especially Grimlock :smile:
</o:p></SPAN></SPAN>
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
Tha flames lack depth and look very two-dimesnional when comapred with
the dragons head. The mans position on the dragons back is a little
strange, as someone sitting the way he is would usually turn their head
and turn their torso only slightly if at all.
Re: Test
Posted by ReNo on
Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 5:29pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
The spear doesn't look a fitting weapon for him either - a demon thing of his stature should surely have something a bit more ornate!
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 10:16pm
Posted
2004-12-07 10:16pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
You might want to creat a light source on your dragon's face that is coming from the fire. It will make it look awesome if you do that.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Tue Dec 7th 2004 at 11:02pm
Posted
2004-12-07 11:02pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
I just want to note some human proportions here instead of starting a new thread. I've done some reading and measuring myself and these are proportions anybody can use when drawing humans or anthro.
1) Body is about 7 heads high from the bottom of the feet to the top of the shoulders.
2) Waiste is slightly less wide than shoulders
3) arms are shorter than legs
4) when standing up finger tips reach down past the waiste and about half way to the knees
5) hands are shorter than feet
6) the upper part of the arm is the same length as the lower part of the arm.
7) the upper part of the leg is the same length as the lower part of the leg.
P.S. If you see any proportional errors in these notes let me know.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 10:41am
Posted
2004-12-08 10:41am
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Actually the body is more like 6 to 6 1/2 heads high. 7 head is a little high but five is too short. For some f**ked up reason though sometimes you can get a good looking figure with 5 heads high and sometimes 7 heads.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 7:27pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Well I did some more measuring and read up on human proportions some more and it seems that the average is 5 heads high. Also I'd like to state that for males the shoulders are about 2 heads wide and for females the shoulders are about 1.5 heads wide.
Re: Test
Posted by Crono on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 8:19pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I told you! 7 heads is for a SUPER-HERO or comic books in general. They have mis proportioned sizes everywhere. It is five heads high for a realistic drawing.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 8:24pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Ok so I've been doing some MORE research and measuring and I have come to a conclusion. Go with 5.5 if you want your person to look perfect. This is how I am going to be doing it from now on. 5 and 7 can also be good if you are doing something a little different. 7 would be used for something like a villian in a comic book and five would be used for a normal person who is having to carry a lot of stuff or is being weighed down by something they are carry such as armor.
Re: Test
Posted by Kanniball on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 9:15pm
29 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 4th 2004
Location: Sweden
Man! You guys take this rather seriously, don't you? :biggrin: <?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" /><v:shapetype id=_x0000_t75 stroked="f" filled="f" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" coordsize="21600,21600"><v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:connecttype="rect" gradientshapeok="t" o:extrusionok="f"></v:path><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></o:lock></v:shapetype><o:p></o:p>
I don?t think that getting the "character?s" right height is hard, I never think so much about it... I go entirely on "feeling" :razz: <o:p></o:p>
It's the hands, feet and legs I'm worried about! Does anyone have like a tut or something? Would be very aprishiated! <o:p></o:p>
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Dec 8th 2004 at 10:41pm
Posted
2004-12-08 10:41pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
If Lep would open up a tutorial section on drawing I'd gladly write some tuts. You can't go on feeling or you'll mess up. It's always good to draw everything ahead of time lightly and to draw up a skeleton (stick figure drawn really lightly) first of the person and then build off of that. It will make everything look better and you'll notice your proportions are more accurate.
Re: Test
Posted by Kanniball on
Thu Dec 9th 2004 at 1:15pm
29 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 4th 2004
Location: Sweden
Yeah but I mean the actual form of the hand while you are holding something!
Although, knowing there are three musceles (as you wrote) it makes it a little easier.
Oh and Spartan, I always mess up when I'm doing skeletons for my characters, Everything gets wrong :razz:
Re: Test
Posted by Kanniball on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 11:26am
Posted
2004-12-10 11:26am
29 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 4th 2004
Location: Sweden
Thx for the link Crono. :smile:
Re: Test
Posted by Myrk- on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:09pm
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
604 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Location: Plymouth, UK
I don't like your use of photoshop filters in your pictures, looks a bit crummy.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:51pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
I don't think I'll ever use PSP to color my pictures except for maybe on a few occasions. I like the old fashioned way of prismas and paint.
Re: Test
Posted by Crono on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 9:56pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Prisma what? Colored Pencils, Markers, Oil Paint? Amongst the other twelve billion products they make.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 10:20pm
Posted
2004-12-10 10:20pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Sorry about the confusion. Whenever I say prismas I always mean the prisma colored pencils. I love those things. Freakin box of 120 cost me $100. Those damn things are expensive.
Re: Test
Posted by Crono on
Fri Dec 10th 2004 at 10:38pm
Posted
2004-12-10 10:38pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I got the 120 pack for like 75% off :smile: (Go company discounts)
Re: Test
Posted by Foxpup on
Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 6:35am
Foxpup
member
380 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 26th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: the Land of Oz
You paid a hundred bucks for 120 pencils?!? Are they really, really good pencils or something? I think Faber-Castell watercolour pencils are the way to go. It's pencil and paint all in one cheap, thin, wooden rod.
Re: Test
Posted by Spartan on
Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 10:59am
Posted
2004-12-13 10:59am
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Crono I might just have to give you my mailing address. :smile:
Re: Test
Posted by Crono on
Mon Dec 13th 2004 at 8:36pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
can't get them that cheap anymore. :sad:
It was like ... 4 years ago when I got them.