Re: ITER
Posted by azelito on
Tue Jun 28th 2005 at 2:20pm
azelito
member
570 posts
127 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 8th 2002
Occupation: Wierdness
Location: Sweden
Yes. Nice.
"Azelito, stop being a f**king bitch. All I see you do is complain and insult people in your recent posts. We don't care, go find a razor you emo pansy..." -Windows98
Re: ITER
Posted by SaintGreg on
Tue Jun 28th 2005 at 8:12pm
212 posts
51 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 3rd 2004
Big fusion just keeps going bigger. Every new version they say
they will hit unity fusion power out and they never do. I my
opinion the 5 billion or whatever its going to cost to make ITER a
reality would be infinitely better spent on smaller research projects,
improving our understanding of the plasma dynamics. Then maybe we
could attempt something bigger. But after all - what good is a
fusion reactor if it needs to be the size of 5 aircraft carriers?
It's not very practical, and no actual electrical power company would
build one. Industry is smarter than the government in that regard
To get something to work, sometimes you just have to beat your head against the wall longer; the skin grows back, but the brick doesn't.
Source hates soup!
2271 posts
445 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 22nd 2003
Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Location: Seattle WA, USA
Thank God. I've been following this for years, and I'm damn pleased to see them finaly pick a site!
Some people are like slinkys...
They aren?t really good for anything, but you can't help but laugh when one tumbles down the stairs.
Re: ITER
Posted by SaintGreg on
Wed Jun 29th 2005 at 3:27am
212 posts
51 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 3rd 2004
I haven't really been following fusion as of late, but I wonder how
inertial confinement research is going? I always thought that was
certainly the more promising route for power generation. I know
sandia planned to create a target container to be driven with their
z-pinch but I don't know what ever happened to that. All that
z-pinchy goodness. Mmmmmmm.
Either way, not all fusion schemes have been explored on the small
scale enough to (IMO) be put to that large of a scale.
Stellerators, spheromaks, spherical torus, etc etc. Pretty much
the biggest of the big has always been the plain jane tokamak, even
though it seems like the newer (smaller) projects have seemingly been
more sucessful, or at least have more potential.
To get something to work, sometimes you just have to beat your head against the wall longer; the skin grows back, but the brick doesn't.
Source hates soup!