Re: 64=65???
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 2:40am
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
Look at the slopes of the slanted edges of the triangles and the quadrilaterals. The triangles have a slope (rise over run) of 3/8, while the quadrilaterals have a slope of 2/5. Obviously, this means they can't be placed flush on each other to recreate a rectangle as the animation attempts to do. The small amount of error in this, throughout the whole thing, adds up to a difference of one block.
Re: 64=65???
Posted by Cassius on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 3:08am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
I never saw that in the picture version of this same puzzle, however in the video, the angle is quit obviously odd.
Re: 64=65???
Posted by Rumple on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 5:35am
Rumple
member
518 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Web Dev
Location: NSW, Australia
cool thx everyone
What do the chinese/japanese characters have to do with it?
Re: 64=65???
Posted by Rumple on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 6:14am
Rumple
member
518 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Web Dev
Location: NSW, Australia
isnt it the pythagorean theorum?
[EDIT]
actually thats
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">[color=white]a<SUP>2</SUP>+ b<SUP>2</SUP>=c<SUP>2</SUP>
<SUP><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p>isnt it?</o:p></SUP>
[/color]<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
Re: 64=65???
Posted by gimpinthesink on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 8:05am
662 posts
176 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 21st 2002
Occupation: student
Location: Forest Town, Notts
Thats what it's from.
I was alway taught that it was pythagorus' theorum
Re: 64=65???
Posted by gimpinthesink on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 8:06am
662 posts
176 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 21st 2002
Occupation: student
Location: Forest Town, Notts
The hell I only pressed once.
It must be A Flock of Seagulls that did it cos there running so far away.
Re: 64=65???
Posted by G4MER on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 11:48am
Posted
2003-11-16 11:48am
G4MER
floaty snark rage
member
2460 posts
360 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 6th 2003
Location: USA
Could the DBl Post be because of this pythagorean theorum?
Click once = 2 messages..
($)
Re: 64=65???
Posted by Cassius on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 6:23pm
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
That one actually is true, but obviously, you can't rearrange shapes in something cut out like that and expect it to make the same figure.
Re: 64=65???
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Sun Nov 16th 2003 at 11:40pm
Posted
2003-11-16 11:40pm
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
Except it's exactly the same thing, heck the slopes of the two diagonals involved are exactly the same. It's a bit more subtle though.