Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by FatStrings on
Wed Sep 7th 2005 at 1:21am
1242 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 11th 2005
Occupation: Architecture Student
Location: USA
in the great words of adam sandler
peeing your pants is cool
but neway pete was a jacka**
EDIT: that better French?
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by FatStrings on
Fri Sep 9th 2005 at 12:46am
Posted
2005-09-09 12:46am
1242 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 11th 2005
Occupation: Architecture Student
Location: USA
sorry i forgot to add the sarcasm coloring
it wont happen again
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Fri Sep 9th 2005 at 6:05pm
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
Raising the driving age is a poorly thought-through idea. Far too much of our service industry is built on temporary labor from students. Far too much of our country is also to spread out to make public transport / bicycling / walking a decent replacement. You can raise the driving age in a place like Manhattan (and indeed, they have), but it's not gonna work in Generic Connecticut Suburb #1-25.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Underdog on
Sat Sep 10th 2005 at 11:26pm
Posted
2005-09-10 11:26pm
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 12th 2004
Occupation: Sales-Construction
Location: United States
Personally, I think the only people who should be allowed to drink are those who really do not like alcohol. I was raised in an alcoholic environment and its not an ideal setting for a family atmosphere. Do I drink? Occasionally. I have been known to make a 30 pack of beer last in excess of 2 years. Alcohol, like any other thing can be used, or abused.
There is no history until something happens, then there is.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Crono on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 2:23am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
What are you talking about??
The only reason not to use public transportation is that it's MORE EXPENSIVE and slower.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Dr Brasso on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 2:50am
1878 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 30th 2003
Occupation: cad drafter
Location: Omaha,NE
yeah, itll take at least 2 weeks before they need new paint and upholstery...
*****runs
Doc B... :dodgy:
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 6:52am
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting wil5on</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>In what way is it more expensive, unless youre driving a hybrid car or something?</DIV></DIV>To add to this, don't forget count the price of purchasing/maintaining a car for personal use. Even in a city with junk for a public transportation system (Hartford), it's crazy dirt cheap. Albany, with a similarly junky bus system, even used to let me ride certain buses for free thanks to my College ID. Now if Albany had had places worth going...
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Crono on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 9:56am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Sorry, I was speaking specifically about my state. Now it's getting to be around the same price. But I'm not speaking about maintaining a car ... since you'd have to drive to the light rail pick up spots anyway.
I'll give some incite, I'm sure Tracer could add as well.
(All the prices are as of a year, or so, ago. Recently prices changed, but they were this way for several years)
Here, it takes me about 15 minutes, 30 minutes in traffic, to get to downtown Portland. Not too bad. Taking the Max (which is what they dubbed the light rail system here) takes AT LEAST 45 minutes. Not to mention, it drops off about 10 block away from where I need to be. That amount of time that it takes to walk to where I need to be is about the same amount of time it would take me to find a spot.
When I drive down, it usually takes about 15 minutes, I never really have classes during traffic heavy times, and it takes anywhere from 1 minute to 20 minutes to find a spot, that's pretty much a variable, but, if I leave at the time I usually leave, I get one in about 5 minutes, at the most.
The spot only costs 60 cents an hour, compared to other spots which are a dollar an hour.
The max costs $1.75, and the ticket only lasts about an hour. So a round trip would cost $3.50. Parking for the same class would only be $1.20 (two hour class). Now, my car gets roughly 220 Miles on 10 gallons (which is awful, should be better now, had to replace the fuel pump and got the injectors cleaned, properly), at the time, gas was about $1.98/Gallon (about a year ago), so, taking that I have 12 gallon tank (fuel light comes on when 2 gallons are left), that means, if I fill up 10 gallons, that'd cost: $19.80, divide that by 220 = $0.09 / mile. Trip to school, and back, is 30 miles: $2.70, add parking: $3.90.
So, honestly, I'd rather pay 40 extra cents to be to school 15 to 30 minutes faster and not have to run to my class carrying s**t.
Not to mention, at the transit center, sunset, You have to pay to park! Not that I'd go there, but it's retarded.
I also didn't count the gas it would take to drive to the "park n' ride" stations. Not to mention, if they're full you have to go to another one, which is an immense pain in the ass.
Anyway, NOW, it doesn't matter, since they raised all parking prices to $1.25 an hour :\
They raised the price of Max though too. But, for a long day, I'd take the train anyway.
But, I don't think it'd be good to assume that if you took public transportation you wouldn't have a vehicle.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Crono on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 10:18am
Posted
2005-09-11 10:18am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Yeah, it's pretty terrible, the only thing I'll give it is that it runs pretty smooth. However ... the douches that they are ... made it so the rails don't interlock with the wheels of the train, meaning it can, potentially, be derailed from simple things ... like ice ... who would of though that in Oregon ICE would form on METAL ... through a high elevation hill.
When the time you'd want to take the train, when it gets icy and dangerous to drive, the damn thing isn't available.
The old transportation adviser ... or whoever ... didn't want to alleviate traffic problems, because he wanted people to use the light-rail more ... to think, if they just made an express line from Hillsboro to Sunset to Portland and back the same way, tons of people would pack on. Lowering the price to pocket change would be good too. Also ... if the train went over 35 - 40 miles an hour, that'd be good too. (They can safely go up to about 60, I think)
They don't plan on improving it, I'm sure. They're just putting up more tracks in obscure areas.
The only thing I'll give it, is there's a line that goes all the way up to the airport (PDX), which, is pretty nice, since you wouldn't want to catch a cab or something like that, that'd easily cost well over $100. Same with parking your car at the airport.
So, that's good, but for other intensive purposes ... it sucks.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by $loth on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 5:00pm
$loth
member
2256 posts
292 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 27th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: South England
How many litres are in a gallon?
It costs about 93pence (about $1.7) here for a litre of petrol (around my area it does, differs in different areas).
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Crono on
Sun Sep 11th 2005 at 10:11pm
Posted
2005-09-11 10:11pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
The stations here aren't close enough to walk to quickly. Not to mention, if you don't get there right on time, you have to wait until the next train (at least 15 minutes) and when you're trying to get somewhere, like a class, this is really just a pain in the ass. I'd have to get up about 4 to 5 hours before hand to be there on time and I don't get enough sleep as it is.
But, if they were closer, man, that'd be great. Cheaper transportation, no dealing with traffic. Hey, I'm all for it, but the current system sucks smelly goat ass.
The thing that really pisses me off though ... is they had an entire trolley system in Portland, about 100 years ago, around, the 30s I think, they ripped it all out since most everyone owned a car, "Why would we ever need trolleys again?" they questioned. Bad move. Come to think of it, they got rid of the subway system too. Idiots.
But, I'm mostly bitching, sorry. It's just most train systems here are poorly designed. It'd be nice if we had bullet trains. A lot of people work in the city, so, you'd think they'd have it as an express way.
Even with a student discount, a term pass still costs around $60. Which, if you're a student, you really don't have $60 to cough up all at once. I'll never understand where companies get the idea that college students have tons of cash ... high schoolers are the ones with the cash!
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: U.S. Drinking Age
Posted by Gaara on
Mon Sep 12th 2005 at 7:51am
Gaara
member
219 posts
22 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 12th 2005
Occupation: Freelance Gynacologist
Location: Australia
Here in Australia the drinking and driving age is 18. We also have drive thru pubs. Does anyone see a problem with this?