IE or FF? or others.

IE or FF? or others.

Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 3:51am
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 3:51am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
amanderino said:
And I'm pretty sure IE7 ripped all of the graphics from Firefox. At least, it appears that way.
Isn't that like saying that Ford stole Chevrolet's ideas because they both have tires?

Ford was around, before Chevy, and IE was around before FF. I doubt they stole anything.. Besides, it may be simply a matter of great minds thinking alike. :swear: <--- cool smiley.

The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by amanderino on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 3:56am
amanderino
205 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 3:56am
205 posts 21 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 13th 2006 Location: United States
Maybe.. maybe. They look identical to me. Not that care, though, I don't use IE or FF. :razz:
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by wil5on on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 8:29am
wil5on
1733 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 8:29am
wil5on
member
1733 posts 570 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 12th 2003 Occupation: Mapper Location: Adelaide
asterix_vader said:
ok it was at 80% or so and i stopped it. it found like 88 spyware and 22 virus, most of them were dlls (many wsock32.dll), cookies, exes (i know them all). none was actually a virus.

now i'm sure there's no need to install an antivirus. thanks for the link!
Umm... viruses can infect other files. Chances are you got one at some point and it infected everything it got its hands on. Do something about it as soon as you can.
"If you talk at all during this lesson, you have detention. Do you understand?"
  • My yr11 Economics teacher
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by azelito on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 9:37am
azelito
570 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 9:37am
azelito
member
570 posts 127 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 8th 2002 Occupation: Wierdness Location: Sweden
FF, because I can no longer browse without using tabs.
"Azelito, stop being a f**king bitch. All I see you do is complain and insult people in your recent posts. We don't care, go find a razor you emo pansy..." -Windows98
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by Crono on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 10:09am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 10:09am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
amanderino said:
And I'm pretty sure IE7 ripped all of the graphics from Firefox. At least, it appears that way.
Isn't that like saying that Ford stole Chevrolet's ideas because they both have tires?
Ford was around, before Chevy, and IE was around before FF. I doubt they stole anything.. Besides, it may be simply a matter of great minds thinking alike. :swear: <--- cool smiley.
Yeah, but no.

Firefox has always been related to Netscape, and that browser dates back to 1994 (Released as a beta under the name Mosaic). IE only goes back as far as 1995 or possibly not even back that far.

Go here for information.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by supacomix.njb on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 10:30am
supacomix.njb
33 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 10:30am
33 posts 133 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 16th 2006 Occupation: Student Location: England
Opera FTW.

Its got everything that i enjoy about the other browsers and more.
SupaComix.co.uk

<A HREF="http://www.supacomix.co.uk/ettv" TARGET="_blank">Sods Law? Murphy's Law? Or Inhabitants Law? Have it exp
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 1:27pm
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 1:27pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
You know thats kinda sad. Netscape's been around so long and its used least.

I would use Netscape but the load times are horrible... Or were.

Still, I wonder if it is a theft thing, or just that there is a finite amount of features available and only now are all the browsers deciding to incorporate some common ones.

I am still using IE6, I don't just jump on band wagons so I am not real sure what the most recent perks are about these browsers everyone is raving over.

In the end, if Ford or Chevy gives you the ride you like, who cares what tabs it has? :lol:

The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by reaper47 on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 5:04pm
reaper47
2827 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 5:04pm
reaper47
member
2827 posts 1921 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 16th 2005 Location: Austria
? quoting OtZmanTry this and see.
ok it was at 80% or so and i stopped it. it found like 88 spyware and 22 virus, most of them were dlls (many wsock32.dll), cookies, exes (i know them all). none was actually a virus.
now i'm sure there's no need to install an antivirus. thanks for the link!
You sound like Bush talking about the Iraq. Seriously, if your PC was a human being he had terminal cancer and AIDS. Do something, that's really dangerous!
Why snark works.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by asterix_vader on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 5:13pm
asterix_vader
494 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 5:13pm
494 posts 49 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 29th 2003 Occupation: Trying to find one Location: Peru
text files are dangerous? the dlls were eliminated, the exe files are programs that i downloaded/installed myself. it's ok, there's nothing to worry about!
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by reaper47 on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 6:08pm
reaper47
2827 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 6:08pm
reaper47
member
2827 posts 1921 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 16th 2005 Location: Austria
Well, I didn't know the program actually deleted them. Harmless-looking exe files can contain a virus, of course. So you might have installed a virus-free program but whenever you launch it you might also launch a few kilobytes of code that was added later.

Anyway, I just wanted to save you some trouble, man. Viruses look harmless until the day they get really nasty (which usually is a day before you need to print an important file that is then forever lost).

I'll stop now but don't say I didn't warn you :wink:
Why snark works.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by asterix_vader on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 6:45pm
asterix_vader
494 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 6:45pm
494 posts 49 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 29th 2003 Occupation: Trying to find one Location: Peru
hehe. ok, thanks for warning me.
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by azelito on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 8:17pm
azelito
570 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 8:17pm
azelito
member
570 posts 127 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 8th 2002 Occupation: Wierdness Location: Sweden
Seriously, if your PC was a human being he had terminal cancer <i style="color: white;">and</i> AIDS.
Best.
Line.
Ever.
"Azelito, stop being a f**king bitch. All I see you do is complain and insult people in your recent posts. We don't care, go find a razor you emo pansy..." -Windows98
Re: IE or FF? or others. Posted by Crono on Wed Jan 10th 2007 at 9:45pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2007-01-10 9:45pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
You know thats kinda sad. Netscape's been around so long and its used least.
I would use Netscape but the load times are horrible... Or were.
Still, I wonder if it is a theft thing, or just that there is a finite amount of features available and only now are all the browsers deciding to incorporate some common ones.
I am still using IE6, I don't just jump on band wagons so I am not real sure what the most recent perks are about these browsers everyone is raving over.
In the end, if Ford or Chevy gives you the ride you like, who cares what tabs it has? :lol:
It's not sad. Almost the entire originating Netscape team works with the Mozilla Group ... if you want to support them: use Firefox. AOL bought Netscape in the mid-late 90s and just grounded it to dust, by trying to whore out the suite in the same vein as MS does with IE. They also packed mandatory pieces of software like AIM and AOL into the browser. Just really clunky stuff. They also demanded that the browser be released on many occasions before it was done.

Just to note, IE was someone else's browser licensed to Microsoft under a new name (I don't remember the name it was Sky something). They were sued for it as well, because they weren't paying the company any royalties. They got out of that by saying they didn't sell IE it was packaged with Windows for free.

The things they introduced to make IE "better" are exactly what people exploit to gain access to your computer (active x, for example). While it allowed people incredible control over the browser ... it had to be executable code, which allowed access to the machine's hardware ... so they just made a streamline of access into the heart of your computer.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.