i like the map, the textures are great.. but the image size almost makes me look elsewhere each time i look at this authors post.
now, i dare someone to tell me there is an appreciable difference between these two screen shots
stands tapping foot
we still have to many 56k users to have pages of the 1-2 megs size on just everyday map subjects.. a critique is one thing,
but profiles are for this stuff when the author posts screens of his pride and joy.
the screens are much to large.. the site they are uploaded to may be partially at fault, but my page loaded slow as hell and me on DSL..
Xat JPG Optimizer is calling to you.. USE IT!
to many people have already complained about this subject, soon it will go past complaining into arguing.. heed my advice.. use the program.
/ rant