[map] cs_nimrod

[map] cs_nimrod

Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Agent Smith on Wed Nov 24th 2004 at 1:04am
Agent Smith
803 posts
Posted 2004-11-24 1:04am
803 posts 449 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 30th 2003 Occupation: Uni Student Location: NSW, Australia
This is a a discussion topic for the map "cs_nimrod" by Agent Smith which can be found here

Map description:

Here's the work I've done on cs_iranian_embassy converted to the source engine, under the new title cs_nimrod.

I've tarted it up a fair bit more than the old version, as would be expected, and what I have so far created is accurate. Obviously the texturing is only temporary till I get my hands on the full SDK and all those HL2 textures, but it still gives a good idea of the progress so far.

When I figure out how to use the new modelling program the detailed ornaments that are currently brushes will be replaced by models.

Map screenshots:
Loading embedded content: Map #1316
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by omegaslayer on Wed Nov 24th 2004 at 5:04am
omegaslayer
2481 posts
Posted 2004-11-24 5:04am
2481 posts 595 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2004 Occupation: Sr. DevOPS Engineer Location: Seattle, WA
Looks good.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Forceflow on Wed Nov 24th 2004 at 7:07am
Forceflow
2420 posts
Posted 2004-11-24 7:07am
2420 posts 451 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 6th 2003 Occupation: Engineering Student (CS) Location: Belgium
Shouldn't there be a little more space on those balconies ? (So people can move around a bit on em)

Otherwise, looking good !
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Junkyard God on Wed Nov 24th 2004 at 8:09am
Junkyard God
654 posts
Posted 2004-11-24 8:09am
654 posts 81 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 27th 2004 Occupation: Stoner/mucisian/level design Location: The Nether Regions
Looks good, only the pillars in screenies nr 3 area bit flat, you might want to make them round , itmight looks better that way, but maybe its just the angle the screenshot was taken from.

overal looks pretty neat. :)
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by G.Ballblue on Wed Nov 24th 2004 at 8:17pm
G.Ballblue
1511 posts
Posted 2004-11-24 8:17pm
1511 posts 211 snarkmarks Registered: May 16th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: A secret Nuclear Bunker on Mars
Out of curiousity, is everything on that building solid? I'm trying to figure out if I still need to "func_wall" things to reduce polygon count.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Agent Smith on Thu Nov 25th 2004 at 1:13am
Agent Smith
803 posts
Posted 2004-11-25 1:13am
803 posts 449 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 30th 2003 Occupation: Uni Student Location: NSW, Australia
I think the idea blue is that you make detail into models, not actually using the old method of func_wall anymore. Most of the brush work is solid, but I did make the hand railing on the balcony, the little pillar things in that, a func_wall. I think we'd have to ask Reno or Lep about that, they seem to be the resident experts on all things source.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by ReNo on Thu Nov 25th 2004 at 3:04pm
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2004-11-25 3:04pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
Func_wall's are now obsolete in their use as performance tools, but still have uses as being able to switch textures and things by triggering them. The new entity to use for reducing face splitting (to reduce polycount) and stopping an object blocking vis (to decrease compile times) is the func_detail, which uses less memory than a func_wall by having absolutely no properties (ie. it is an entity purely for the sake of being an entity, not for having any functional use).

In the source engine it is encouraged to use props, as these are only held in memory once, and for every use in the map this data is referenced. On the other hand, if you build everything out of brushes, all this data is loaded in. Also, for reasons I don't know off hand, it is less expensive in terms of processing to render models than BSP stuff.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Agent Smith on Fri Nov 26th 2004 at 12:02am
Agent Smith
803 posts
Posted 2004-11-26 12:02am
803 posts 449 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 30th 2003 Occupation: Uni Student Location: NSW, Australia
Thanks Reno, I figured it was something along those lines. It's a shame the new modelling program is so complex compared to Milkshape. It's going to make it difficult for people to make custom models as easily as before. I don't see why they couldn't introduce a smaller modelling program for small, low polygon stuff.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by ReNo on Fri Nov 26th 2004 at 3:44am
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2004-11-26 3:44am
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
I'm sure that Milkshape will update to support HL2 - it might only be suited to low poly stuff but thats fine for props and the like. Alternatively there is gmax, which is far more like milkshape and softimage.
Re: [map] cs_nimrod Posted by Renegatus on Thu Dec 9th 2004 at 10:42am
Renegatus
57 posts
Posted 2004-12-09 10:42am
57 posts 55 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 17th 2004 Occupation: Web designer/AS Level Student Location: Wolverhampton
Iranian Embassy? Like the one in England? That'd be a great level, especially if CTs did the grenade thing on the balcony! The Embassy looks really nice, I shall be adding this to my clanserver's map rotation! :D