A bit OTT?

A bit OTT?

Re: A bit OTT? Posted by $loth on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 7:20pm
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 7:20pm
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
Some images in this post have been automatically down-sized, click on them to view the full sized versions:

Is this door frame type thing over the top, not in the way of r_speeds but just as a look?

User posted image
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Nugg3t on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 7:27pm
Nugg3t
46 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 7:27pm
Nugg3t
member
46 posts 15 snarkmarks Registered: Jun 22nd 2004 Occupation: Student
Yes, imho. Seems really unnecessary unless you're conforming to some kind of a theme where such unusual curves are common.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by JFry on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 7:49pm
JFry
369 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 7:49pm
JFry
member
369 posts 82 snarkmarks Registered: Mar 9th 2004 Occupation: Scumbag Location: USA
I think it all depends on your theme and how you plan to texture it. Of course in my opinion if you have such a highly detailed doorframe then the other things in the level should be equally as detailed or more. Otherwise it may stand out, even if you find a suitable theme.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Tracer Bullet on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 7:52pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 7:52pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
It looks a bit wierd if there is no reason for it...
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by $loth on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 7:57pm
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 7:57pm
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
Thanks for your opinions, I thought it looked a bit ott mainly because its just a door frame. Thanks for the help, any more opinions?
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Wild Card on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 8:01pm
Wild Card
2321 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 8:01pm
2321 posts 391 snarkmarks Registered: May 20th 2002 Occupation: IT Consultant Location: Ontario, Canada
It looks odd by itself. But if the rest of your level contains wall details and such, it would look really good.

As well, lower the detail on it a little bit. Its increasing Rs for nothing. Unless this is a very low detailed area, in which case a highly detailed door trim would look out of place.

Another thing. Your trim has a lot of detail. Which would look good if the rest of the room followed suit. Problem. Your doors look plain. Adding little pieces of 2*2 units or so in a vertical or horizontal manner to represent bars of steel holding the door together. Adding detail for the lock, or hinges, or even putting little holes in the door, like cracks through the wood. either in brushes or with a { texture.

Just a though.

Floor looks odd too how it goes down 16 units for the door.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Tracer Bullet on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 8:28pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 8:28pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
Wild Card said:
It looks odd by itself. But if the rest of your level contains wall details and such, it would look really good.

As well, lower the detail on it a little bit. Its increasing Rs for nothing. Unless this is a very low detailed area, in which case a highly detailed door trim would look out of place.

Another thing. Your trim has a lot of detail. Which would look good if the rest of the room followed suit. Problem. Your doors look plain. Adding little pieces of 2*2 units or so in a vertical or horizontal manner to represent bars of steel holding the door together. Adding detail for the lock, or hinges, or even putting little holes in the door, like cracks through the wood. either in brushes or with a { texture.

Just a though.

Floor looks odd too how it goes down 16 units for the door.
Carefull now. huge ammounts of small brush-based detail can start to look tacky in a hurry.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by ReNo on Fri Sep 10th 2004 at 8:55pm
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2004-09-10 8:55pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
The brushwork itself is nice enough, just ensure its environment suits
it. The brushwork surrounding it in that shot, suggests to me that it
doesn't. I'd also say use less faces on your curves - there is little
need for it to be quite that smooth really.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Cassius on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 2:34am
Cassius
1989 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 2:34am
Cassius
member
1989 posts 238 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 24th 2001
It's gonna look like a prefab if the rest of the map is low-poly. By the way, there's absolutely no reason to make it with so many polygons.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by G.Ballblue on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 3:04am
G.Ballblue
1511 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 3:04am
1511 posts 211 snarkmarks Registered: May 16th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: A secret Nuclear Bunker on Mars
Can we see a textured version :sailor:
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by $loth on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 6:15am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 6:15am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
G.Ballblue said:
Can we see a textured version :sailor:
Nope, im just trying out some stuff for a HL2 map so there be no textures yet.

Thanks for the replys, I think i've got an idea of what to do with it.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by $loth on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 6:45am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 6:45am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
Some images in this post have been automatically down-sized, click on them to view the full sized versions:

I think this one is better :

User posted image
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Wild Card on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 5:55pm
Wild Card
2321 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 5:55pm
2321 posts 391 snarkmarks Registered: May 20th 2002 Occupation: IT Consultant Location: Ontario, Canada
Doesnt seem like much changed. You removed a part at the top of the frame...
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Gwil on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 6:15pm
Gwil
2864 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 6:15pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts 315 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 13th 2001 Occupation: Student Location: Derbyshire, UK
Just so you know for next time $loth, this forum is more for questions
pertaining to entities/brush errors/compiling - ie, things that can
have a "correct" or "incorrect answer".

Please put all beta work in the "Maps" forum, otherwise it just makes
my futile attempts to run this forum as Q&A database even more
difficult..

So dont do it again! ;P
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Campaignjunkie on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 8:59pm
Campaignjunkie
1309 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 8:59pm
1309 posts 329 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 12th 2002 Occupation: Student Location: West Coast, USA
I think it's a little too much wpoly for something the player will
ultimately glance at for a few seconds. Looks kind of nice, but
ultimately not too efficient for Half-Life IMO.
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by mazemaster on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 9:18pm
mazemaster
890 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 9:18pm
890 posts 438 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 12th 2002
I think it's a little too much wpoly for something the player will
ultimately glance at for a few seconds. Looks kind of nice, but
ultimately not too efficient for Half-Life IMO.
im just trying out some stuff for a HL2 map
Re: A bit OTT? Posted by Campaignjunkie on Sat Sep 11th 2004 at 10:25pm
Campaignjunkie
1309 posts
Posted 2004-09-11 10:25pm
1309 posts 329 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 12th 2002 Occupation: Student Location: West Coast, USA
Oh, my bad. shrug :biggrin:

Not much point in HL2 stuff either, since you can't test it and have no idea what kind of stuff HL2 can do either. But whatever!