Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Orpheus on
Tue May 3rd 2005 at 1:31am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
WOW :eek:
its free too.. /me gets.. 3.5 gigs ain't so bad :smile:
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by G4MER on
Tue May 3rd 2005 at 1:49am
G4MER
floaty snark rage
member
2460 posts
360 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 6th 2003
Location: USA
Its a good film. I just got done watching it. WOW, and to consider they did it all on a volunteer force. I would pay to see that after Star Wars 3 in theaters.. they did a fantastic job.
U have to love Time Warners business class.. ZIP ZOOM ZAM!
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Myrk- on
Tue May 3rd 2005 at 9:16am
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
604 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Location: Plymouth, UK
It seems everyone is trying to download the bit torrent versions... No chance of getting it anytime soon at a good quality :sad:
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Myrk- on
Tue May 3rd 2005 at 9:36am
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
604 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Location: Plymouth, UK
Theres an ftp of it too? Bit Torrent is low on seeds, thats why its slow- theres like 2000 people trying to get it and only 1 nice guy sharing!
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Myrk- on
Wed May 4th 2005 at 4:08pm
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
604 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Location: Plymouth, UK
Ok watched it... Its the worst film I have ever seen! It's just a load of whiney yanks jibbering along in a crap plot line with s**t non-jedi jedi! Jedi don't get angry, and Jedi sense things, this film was s**t, especially the fighting, just everyone had 2 lightsabres, but not 1 woman could yeild even 1!
Don't download it, its a waste of time, and if you must, get the small 260mb version!
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:03am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:03am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Granted this is an independent "film" and it had $0 for a budget. Yet, the worst part of it was the acting. I mean, if everyone was so enthusiastic that they volunteered why couldn't they spend some time making their portrayal and delivery believable? I never thought I'd say this, but, it's worse then Hayden Christensen's acting!
There were some technical problems too. Such as the cameras they used. I'm not sure what it is, because I can't remember the exact reason, probably the shutter speed. Perhaps it is the size of the film it was imprinted on, who knows. But it appears to be shot on 16mm (or something as such). Which, if you didn't know, is used for sports because it doesn't gloss over movements ... which is exactly what you want in a film. The contrast of the effects didn't help that either.
As far as I've seen all Star Wars fans are good at when making films is replicating light saber effects.
The most impressive thing by far was the space sequences ... until they showed inside the cockpit :rolleyes:
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Orpheus on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:12am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:12am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
IMO, for what it cost me to acquire the film, I think its a fabulous movie. Compared to any other SW movie its not in their league, but I have seen worse, MUCH worse in the theaters, and they do not bother to tell you are the ticket booth that it sucks either.
Anywho's, for the price, it was worth the download and the 47 minutes of view time.
I give it a rock solid 7/8 thumb up :smile:
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:14am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:14am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
But you don't pay for, practically, any of your movies ...
You know what else took three years to make? Army of Darkness.
I'd watch that any day over this crap-fest of geeks who got their mom's JVC camcorder out and bought a bopy of after-effects and call themselves film makers.
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:22am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:22am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I don't like it when people take major franchises and make up characters that have incredible amounts of power in their own version who in fact would be evident in the original plot ... Why didn't they make their own "Adventures of the Starkiller" movie?
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:47am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:47am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
And to think: Brent wrote that himself; Nemsis kicked ass though. Whatever happend to Lor? Shouldn't there be incredibly advanced androids because of her?
As far as I'm aware, half of the SW book contradict each other. They don't check them anymore or something. I don't know. I don't really care. The only ones really worth reading are the Heir To The Empire books.
[/geekmode]
Posted
2005-05-06 12:56am
3012 posts
529 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 15th 2005
The only Star Wars author I ever got into was Michael A. Stackpole with
his rogue squadron series. I remember devouring those in middle
school.
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Orpheus on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 12:58am
Posted
2005-05-06 12:58am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Zahn RULZ..
but to my knowledge, the SW universe must conform. No book can contradict another. That was a stipulation when they opened the doors to new books.. Remember, there were no books after "Splinter of the minds eye" until recently. Recently as in from then till now. There was a very big gap between them.
Of course, I could be wrong, but.. I don't think so.
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 1:03am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Yeah, but I thought they stopped checking them. Because I remember books on Darth Vader and how he needs to wear the suit because of years spent in dark side temples (or whatever, it was explained to me) and that contradicts the films. As far as I can tell. We'll know in a couple weeks, right?
Zahn's books are the only one's I've even attempted to read, overall they're excellent. I would want Lucas to make VII, VIII, and IX if he did those three books ... somewhat.
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Orpheus on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 1:10am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
you could be right, as i said, i stopped reading them when chewy died.
it was my understanding that they had to mesh. anyways.. since so many come out in so short a time frame sometimes, there could very well bee some error's
i would like to say that even though my favorite is Zahn, there are some others almost as good. you should seek them out.
the series that dealt with chewy dying was about the children of the Solo's.. very good stuff. they seem to have much of the skywalker gene's.. poor solo, his gene's didn't do a thing for them :razz:
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 2:09am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I never cared about their kids ... ever. However, Mara and Luke's kid(s) would be a different story! I have no idea if they had kids or not though ...
You know, I'm going to stop showing how much I know about the SW universe ... I feel it may be incriminating.
Re: Star Wars: Revelations
Posted by Crono on
Fri May 6th 2005 at 6:49am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Damn straight.
Also, face it, those effects are terrible, however, I wouldn't accept good effects ... ever, not with "Evil Dead" in the name. It just wouldn't be the same.
Does everyone forget Jurassic Park came out in 1993? I mean ... to be honest, most of what's in that movie is rather hard to tell unlike many recent movies. I think it still has amazing CGI, especially for its time.