Invisibility

Invisibility

Re: Invisibility Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Fri May 26th 2006 at 4:46pm
Pvt.Scythe
730 posts
Posted 2006-05-26 4:46pm
730 posts 113 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 19th 2004 Occupation: student Location: Finland
<span name="Konabody">"There are probably quite a number of useful
things you could do with stealth for the military," said researcher
John Pendry, a physicist at Imperial College London.

<span>More mundane applications also include hiding obstacles --
"for example, one may wish to put a cloak over the refinery that is
blocking your view of the bay," said researcher David Schurig, a
physicist at Duke University in Durham, N.C. Moreover, objects
invisible to electromagnetic fields are isolated from them as well.
"You may want to protect something from electromagnetic interference," he added.
</span></span>
Any thoughts? Possibilities or fears? Please share. :smile: Personally I am
afraid of new kind of warfare raising its nasty head in form of stealth
ICBMs and other tools of mass destruction. But it could be just me...
Nevertheless an intresting topic.

Source and read the whole thing:

http://www.physorg.com/news67787896.html
''Everyone wades in s**t until they're competent enough to walk on it. Jesus style.''
Dystopia - Empires
Re: Invisibility Posted by Hugh on Fri May 26th 2006 at 5:00pm
Hugh
900 posts
Posted 2006-05-26 5:00pm
Hugh
member
900 posts 207 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 25th 2003 Occupation: College Student Location: Amerika
Read about this a while ago in Popular Science, good 'ol light refraction. I'm not too worried about "stealth ICBMs" unless radar can't pick 'em up either... either way it'll blow the s**t out of you and you can't really stop it, y'know? :smile: Cool stuff, regardless.
One day you'll know what you're talking about, I can hardly imagine

Maps! - Audio blog!
Re: Invisibility Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Fri May 26th 2006 at 5:08pm
Pvt.Scythe
730 posts
Posted 2006-05-26 5:08pm
730 posts 113 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 19th 2004 Occupation: student Location: Finland
<span name="Konabody"><span>Cloaking devices may also get designed against electric and magnetic fields as well, Pendry said. Scientists might also be capable of engineering
devices vs. acoustic waves as well. "This in fact would be much
simpler," said researcher Ulf Leonhardt, a theoretical physicist at the
University of St. Andrews in Scotland. "One could imagine applications
against sonar as well as things we can't imagine."</span></span>
This made me worry as if you can make those materials "invisible" to
radar a stealth attack with weapons like ICMBs become possible.<span name="Konabody"></span>
''Everyone wades in s**t until they're competent enough to walk on it. Jesus style.''
Dystopia - Empires
Re: Invisibility Posted by Finger on Fri May 26th 2006 at 7:53pm
Finger
672 posts
Posted 2006-05-26 7:53pm
Finger
member
672 posts 1460 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Man, could you imagine the frustration of misplacing your invisible suit? I'm bad enough with my keys.
Re: Invisibility Posted by French Toast on Fri May 26th 2006 at 8:06pm
French Toast
3043 posts
Posted 2006-05-26 8:06pm
3043 posts 304 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2005 Occupation: Kicking Ass Location: Canada
Invisibility cloak.

Cool stuff.
Re: Invisibility Posted by Forceflow on Sun May 28th 2006 at 7:08pm
Forceflow
2420 posts
Posted 2006-05-28 7:08pm
2420 posts 451 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 6th 2003 Occupation: Engineering Student (CS) Location: Belgium
I think that's a fake, toasty.
:: Forceflow.be :: Nuclear Dawn developer
Re: Invisibility Posted by Stadric on Sun May 28th 2006 at 7:51pm
Stadric
848 posts
Posted 2006-05-28 7:51pm
Stadric
member
848 posts 585 snarkmarks Registered: Jun 3rd 2005 Occupation: Slacker Location: Here
It probably is a fake.

That's one of the oldest tricks in the cinematographist's book.
Also change the texture of the dock. Docks are rarely tile. -Facepunch
As I Lay Dying
Re: Invisibility Posted by Y2kBen_2000 on Mon May 29th 2006 at 1:31am
Y2kBen_2000
167 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 1:31am
167 posts 256 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 5th 2004 Occupation: Student: Game Simulation Programming Location: Texas
I saw that system on tv a while back. They were describing using projectors and cameras to cloack obstacles in the time of war. They described it as the closest we may get to actually turning something invisible, untill we can create millions of tiny cameras and light diodes that mimick exactly what a peron would see on the other side of you.
You know, I've actually got nothing to say
Re: Invisibility Posted by Foxpup on Mon May 29th 2006 at 4:03am
Foxpup
380 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 4:03am
Foxpup
member
380 posts 38 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 26th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: the Land of Oz
Quick question. If you were cloak, say an aircraft, and all the light gets refracted around it, how would the pilot be able to see outside?
Better to be in denial than to be human.

Bill Gates understands binary: his company is number one, and his customers are all zeros.
Re: Invisibility Posted by Agent Smith on Mon May 29th 2006 at 4:25am
Agent Smith
803 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 4:25am
803 posts 449 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 30th 2003 Occupation: Uni Student Location: NSW, Australia
Of course thats just cloaking for the naked eye. They would also need to be able to cloak heat and electronic signatures to be completely effective, not to mention radar which still detects an object being present. I'd say its still a while off. Besides, why are they spending time on cloaking devices, I expressely ordered they focus all attention on the creation of a Holodeck :smile: .
Ham and Jam Contributor
http://www.hamandjam.org

'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'
Re: Invisibility Posted by Foxpup on Mon May 29th 2006 at 4:39am
Foxpup
380 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 4:39am
Foxpup
member
380 posts 38 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 26th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: the Land of Oz
Of course thats just cloaking for the naked eye. They would also need to be able to cloak heat and electronic signatures to be completely effective, not to mention radar which still detects an object being present.
If you actually read the article, you would have seen that they're starting out cloaking from microwaves (ie, RaDAR) and working up to higher frequencies (like IR (heat) and visible light), because higher frequencies are more difficult to cloak from.
Better to be in denial than to be human.

Bill Gates understands binary: his company is number one, and his customers are all zeros.
Re: Invisibility Posted by Agent Smith on Mon May 29th 2006 at 5:26am
Agent Smith
803 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 5:26am
803 posts 449 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 30th 2003 Occupation: Uni Student Location: NSW, Australia
I'm actually at work and don't really have too much time to read other stuff, my comment was really just a quick response to Y2kben's comment about visible cloaking, which is relatively limited without the other cloaking types I mentioned, and you confirmed were in the article. Thanks for that confirmation, and its interesting to note that it is easier to hide the mass of an object on radar than to hide its physical appearance to the naked eye. I appreciate your enthusiasm and interest in enlightening me to said info.
Ham and Jam Contributor
http://www.hamandjam.org

'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'
Re: Invisibility Posted by Y2kBen_2000 on Mon May 29th 2006 at 2:14pm
Y2kBen_2000
167 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 2:14pm
167 posts 256 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 5th 2004 Occupation: Student: Game Simulation Programming Location: Texas
Yeah, what I saw on Tv was just what it was, a prototype; an idea not at all ready for any aplication. The people where trying to demonstrate a simple idea, but where not feasable.
I never said that they managed to hide every other signiture besides the visual. But if you think about it, would many people bother trying to look at a field with infrared gogles hoping to find an invisible house? Not the common man.
You know, I've actually got nothing to say
Re: Invisibility Posted by Gollum on Mon May 29th 2006 at 3:17pm
Gollum
1268 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 3:17pm
Gollum
member
1268 posts 525 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 26th 2001 Occupation: Student Location: Oxford, England
Foxpup said:
Quick question. If you were cloak, say an aircraft, and all the light gets refracted around it, how would the pilot be able to see outside?
Good point! The pilot would not be able to see out, because no light would reach his eyes.
The same applies for invisibility cloaks using this principle. No-one can see you, but you can't see anyone either!

There might be ways round this. If nothing else, you could reveal a very small portion of the object -- enough for eyes or a tiny camera, say. Alternatively, you could use other wavelengths for vision -- if the device was cloaking visible light, then you could use infrared to see, perhaps.
Re: Invisibility Posted by French Toast on Mon May 29th 2006 at 8:32pm
French Toast
3043 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 8:32pm
3043 posts 304 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2005 Occupation: Kicking Ass Location: Canada
Ah, but then enemies could simply use infrared to see you.
Re: Invisibility Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Mon May 29th 2006 at 9:21pm
Pvt.Scythe
730 posts
Posted 2006-05-29 9:21pm
730 posts 113 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 19th 2004 Occupation: student Location: Finland
Ah, but then enemies could simply use infrared to see you.
True, but not everyone is equipped with infrared equipment.
''Everyone wades in s**t until they're competent enough to walk on it. Jesus style.''
Dystopia - Empires
Re: Invisibility Posted by reaper47 on Tue May 30th 2006 at 11:48am
reaper47
2827 posts
Posted 2006-05-30 11:48am
reaper47
member
2827 posts 1921 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 16th 2005 Location: Austria
Ah, but then enemies could simply use infrared to see you.
I'm not sure how difficult it would be to cloak infra-red as well once you figured out how to cloak normal light.
Re: Invisibility Posted by French Toast on Tue May 30th 2006 at 10:54pm
French Toast
3043 posts
Posted 2006-05-30 10:54pm
3043 posts 304 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2005 Occupation: Kicking Ass Location: Canada
But then, once again, how do you see?
Re: Invisibility Posted by reaper47 on Tue May 30th 2006 at 11:25pm
reaper47
2827 posts
Posted 2006-05-30 11:25pm
reaper47
member
2827 posts 1921 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 16th 2005 Location: Austria
But then, once again, how do you see?
you're really thinking this through... hmmmmm
Re: Invisibility Posted by Stadric on Wed May 31st 2006 at 1:03am
Stadric
848 posts
Posted 2006-05-31 1:03am
Stadric
member
848 posts 585 snarkmarks Registered: Jun 3rd 2005 Occupation: Slacker Location: Here
Most people would be content just to start daydreaming about Catholic school girls' locker rooms.
Also change the texture of the dock. Docks are rarely tile. -Facepunch
As I Lay Dying