Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by reaper47 on
Sat Sep 23rd 2006 at 3:16pm
2827 posts
1921 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 16th 2005
Location: Austria
"The world's most wanted terrorist, according to the French newspaper, is believed to have died last August as a result of typhoid fever while in Pakistan."
Typhoid fever? I'm glad to hear a leading figure of a decentralized, ideological terror group, hunted by the worlds biggest intelligence networks for over a decade, has died a natural death. Although perhaps he's still alive, so we don't know.
Wow, that's bitter for the War on Terror enthusiasts...
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by rs6 on
Sat Sep 23rd 2006 at 3:18pm
rs6
member
640 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 31st 2004
Occupation: koledge
Location: New Jersey, USA
Like the article said, it can't be confirmed until we see a body.
I doubt al-queda will show it.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Gorbachev on
Sat Sep 23rd 2006 at 6:54pm
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Haha, he got bested by Oregon Trail.
Okay, but seriously, it's obvious that the Americans wanted to keep him alive, if they can find you to pay taxes they can find a guy who can address millions. This is such a joke.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Cassius on
Sun Sep 24th 2006 at 1:10am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Brief excitement over exaggerated reports of death; relapse into apathy at reiteration of his already well-known sickly condition.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Andrei on
Sun Sep 24th 2006 at 10:43am
Posted
2006-09-24 10:43am
Andrei
member
2455 posts
1248 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 15th 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
I vote for myself.
And his death means next to nothing especially since it was because of an illness we knew he had since 2001.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by French Toast on
Mon Sep 25th 2006 at 8:26pm
3043 posts
304 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 16th 2005
Occupation: Kicking Ass
Location: Canada
There are many people worse than Osama that I wouldn't mind seeing dead.
And Nickel, just 'cause you don't like him doesn't mean there aren't people who did. And just because your invisible man in the sky that governs you wouldn't like him, his invisible man in the sky may support his actions.
It's hard to be rudely awakened if you're dead.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Crono on
Mon Sep 25th 2006 at 8:41pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
But ... why would he make his own kind so delicious and fry-able?
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
3012 posts
529 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 15th 2005
To tempt us...
Chicken is the new edenic apple!
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Crono on
Mon Sep 25th 2006 at 9:16pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
So what? The Vegan's are right? F*ck that!
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Mephs on
Tue Sep 26th 2006 at 7:35pm
Mephs
member
381 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 18th 2004
Occupation: Office Monkey
Location: Northern Ireland
I'm a firm believer in the idea that; stranded on a desert island,
vegans would eat everyone else first. Either that or wade through the
shallow waters sifting plankton through their smug grins....and then
apologising to the plankton.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Andrei on
Wed Sep 27th 2006 at 7:33pm
Andrei
member
2455 posts
1248 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 15th 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
It's arguable whether God is a man in the sky, or man is a god on earth.
But can we please please please not have yet another religious thread?
And by the way, Al Quaeda stated that Binladen is, in fact, still
alive. IMO maybe he still is, but it could just as well be a bluff.
Re: We need a new Boogieman!
Posted by Andrei on
Thu Sep 28th 2006 at 9:59am
Andrei
member
2455 posts
1248 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 15th 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
IIRC they found some bacteria on Mars.
Martian poop?