Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Tue Feb 5th 2008 at 3:29pm
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
1. That's the challenge.
2. That would break the levels.
3. That's the challenge.
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Crono on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 1:09am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
They're actually making a Portal 2. This was confirmed a few days ago.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by hl_world on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 2:06am
144 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 30th 2007
Lame in what way do you think?
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 3:20am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
It would require radically different (and invariably restricted) level designs than what HL1/2 has had, I dunno how you'd do large open areas when you could easily portal across them.
The bigger issue though is how the addition of the grav gun made fundamental changes to the series. The HL2 weapons were all turned into crap with limited ammo in order to encourage grav gun use. The enemies (especially the Combine) lost much of their challenge and their AI (one of the cornerstones of HL1) so that it would be easier to tag them with a radiator. Add another paradigm shift type weapon in the portal gun and who knows what'll happen.
Doesn't really matter though cause I don't seriously think they will get the portal gun in Ep3. I'm sure they'd want to, but I don't see it happening. There'd be too many fringe issues that would be very difficult if not impossible to work around. But then there's all that crap about the Portal universe in HL's and Ep3 involving going to an Aperture Science ship and... :/
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by French Toast on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 4:06am
3043 posts
304 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 16th 2005
Occupation: Kicking Ass
Location: Canada
And I mean, Valve has always failed to impress and be original/groundbreaking in any way shape or form. And I mean if they want to add the portal gun, but they have traditionally used open areas, I can't think of a single thing they'd do other than just give up and trash the idea, I mean.... it only makes sense right?
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 6:09am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting French Toast</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>And I mean, Valve has always failed to impress and be original/groundbreaking in any way shape or form. And I mean if they want to add the portal gun, but they have traditionally used open areas, I can't think of a single thing they'd do other than just give up and trash the idea, I mean.... it only makes sense right?</DIV></DIV>
Do you actually read posts or just see one thing and just go off on it? Let's run a test: How's Fortress Forever doing? Pretty well huh? Just like you said it would?
The Portal commentary talks about all the fringe issues they had to work around to get portals to work to their satisfaction. None of which involved:
-conveying what is and isn't a suitable surface for portals in a 'real world' setting that is consistent and fits HL2 theme/visuals
-allowing portal usage without making the levels even more constrained and on rails than they already are
-having enemy AI that reacts to portals, uses them against you, knows how to avoid/work around them, etc etc
-somehow correctly animating npcs so they look natural when they fall upwards through a floor and all that
-making combat work when the player can simply port enemies away from himself by just opening a portal over a chasm and then shooting the other end at enemy feet, just one of the many ways to make combat too easy/totally pointless
And if they do all that s**t and do it right, great, but it'll probably hurt the core mechanics of the game which will only become apparent when the initial awe wears off. EDIT: What's more likely to happen is, if the portal gun is in Ep3, it'll be similar to the supergravgun, in that it's in its own contained series of levels as opposed to general usage like the gravgun (which is what I am assuming when I made the last two posts and the only way to not make the portal gun a pointless gimmick)
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Fjorn on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 10:06am
Posted
2008-02-06 10:06am
Fjorn
member
250 posts
25 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jun 5th 2004
Occupation: Student/Amateur Writer
Location: California - USA
Yak, I think he was being sarcastic.
Signature? What signature!?
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Naklajat on
Wed Feb 6th 2008 at 8:56pm
1137 posts
384 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 15th 2004
Occupation: Baron
Location: Austin, Texas
COMBINE JET PACK SOLDIERS!!(1)
o
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by Crono on
Thu Feb 7th 2008 at 3:14am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I'm just glad valve isn't the type of developer that gets sick of their own properties.
I hate when that happens.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: HL: Portal
Posted by hl_world on
Thu Feb 7th 2008 at 4:04am
144 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 30th 2007
All that arguing about portals in Episode 3. What if they didn't come in the form of a portal gun. What if they made the gameplay less linear and that it had a similar structure to the Zelda games eg. you can visit the coast, Ravenholm, City 17, Nova Prospekt etc. at any time during the game to achieve goals and unlock other parts of the game and entirely new areas AND later on you have access to portal technology but it comes in the form of stationary gates dotted around the entire game map and you can teleport from one gate to another by 'dialing' it's specified number and then simply walking through.