Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 12:40am
Posted
2004-02-06 12:40am
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
Aah quicktime is the work of the devil. Why do people make all these s**tty formats? Who decided realplayer could have 50 files types of its own? Where are my pants?
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Jinx on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 4:49am
Jinx
member
874 posts
692 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 27th 2002
Location: Ohio
Quicktime is fine for trailers, though I get pissed when you can't save it to your computer and have to watch it on the stupid webpage. and its fullscreen stuff is crap. okay, so I guess it sucks :x
Realplayer is a piece of s**t.
That's really just a 'teaser' trailer for Kill Bill vol2. I thought it was funny as hell. Anyone know when vol1 comes out on dvd, I really want it! :biggrin:
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Cassius on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 5:29am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Oh QuickTime,
How thou dost sucketh,
upon the large and disembodied penis
of Zeus.
- MORE SONGS BIOTCH
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Skeletor on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 5:43am
312 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 28th 2003
Occupation: Student
Location: California
Why don't you guys stop bitching about the format and start commenting on the actual movies. :rolleyes:
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Cash Car Star on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 6:54am
1260 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 7th 2002
Occupation: post-student
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
The Kill Bill 2 thing is just a teaser trailer, I think it's impossible to really judge the movie by it. I think it looks pretty cool though.
As for Quicktime, sure it's no mpg, but I like it hella better than any of them streaming crap they generally try to use so people won't steal there stuff. Dealing with the inevitable connection drop at some point on this campus network is just a pain in the ass. Pound for pound, it always seems like the qualities better than say an rm as well.
Although, it does kind of seem weird that they would be using any form of copy-protection on what really amounts to nothing more than a commercial. I mean, people wanna trade it, it's just getting out more for no extra cost.
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Crono on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 9:23am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Yes!
The cheap B movie effect was done on purpose, obviously. I think that's awesome.
As the first Kill Bill was Anime, Hong Kong Samirai, and several other genres molded together. Volume 2 is basically a big ass western with Samurai swords and cheesy B movie references. A film geeks wet dream.
Tarnetino has been known to make incredibly awesome, and pretty crappy movies as well (Resivoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction = Awesome; Jackie Brown = s**t!).
In either case, Volume I was a masterpiece (as close to a tarentino masterpiece a movie can be).
I am rather disapointed though . . . I thought it was coming out this month :sad:
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 1:00pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
I think I was one of the few people who didn't really like Kill bill. Probably cause I went in expecting something totally different though.
Re: Trailer (trash?)
Posted by Forceflow on
Fri Feb 6th 2004 at 4:19pm
2420 posts
451 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 6th 2003
Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Location: Belgium
... and the combat scenes didn't look so over-done/over-styled as in The Matrix: Reloaded (worst part of the trilogy, imho)