Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by G.Ballblue on
Sat Aug 14th 2004 at 8:23pm
1511 posts
211 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 16th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: A secret Nuclear Bunker on Mars
I'm not having any kind of direct problem with my map, but I have a sort of a... hmmm... "theory" question I suppose. It deals with what would be better for light and r_speeds. Like this:
I have a texture that has a lot releif to it. It looks damn ugly on a flat wall. Simply by making the texture have "releif" to it, it looks awesome. The problem is, I'm not entirely sure what's healthier --
Should I use a flat solid wall as a template, and place func_walls over it? Or would I be better off junking the flat wall, and making the relieft just solid. ??
I hope it isn't to hard to understand -- I can't show you an image cause I don't have an webspace.. but how would you do this?
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fishy on
Sat Aug 14th 2004 at 9:43pm
fishy
member
2623 posts
1476 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 7th 2003
Location: glasgow
if the relief is only small, then i'd say make it func_illusionary, which would save on clipnodes. if it's big enough that someone could use it to stand on, then make it a func_wall.
both func walls and illusionaries will stop the face splitting that will happen if you use solid world brushes, so don't make them solid.
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fizscy46 on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 2:16am
334 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 16th 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Make it into a func_wall, stop using Q-Tools and switch to ZHLT, and you can make it block light as well as save on leafnodes
:biggrin:
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fizscy46 on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 3:51am
334 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 16th 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
So, mapping for two years and you're wondering whether or not to use a func wall?
Tsk tsk.
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 4:00am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
I would simply make the flat brush and then add the bits that stick out. Group all those bits together and then make them one func_wall or func_illusionary.
I'd probably turn them into a func_wall and then clip off the whole thing so you can't get stuck in the bits. This has the added benefits of letting bullets hit them instead of passing through them, preventing the brush from being broken into many faces, and hopefully preventing snags. Then again you won't get any shadows because they're all entities... this would be easier if you had a picture :razz:
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fizscy46 on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 4:02am
334 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 16th 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Set the ZHLT lightflags (Which is available on all brush entities) to opaque and it blocks light. I do that on a lot of my things (For example, on my g-man death map screeshots (See my maps), the lights that hang from the ceiling in the 3rd shot are func_walls, but the light isn't shining above them as if they were normal func_walls
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 4:12am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Yeah, I know, but for some reason they didn't seem to work in reclamation. So screw 'em!
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by Gorbachev on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 5:17am
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Making brush-based entities 'opaque' makes RAD take a much, much longer time and usually look omega-fugly every time I've used it, so I just turn that open off fully.
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fishy on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 6:10am
fishy
member
2623 posts
1476 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 7th 2003
Location: glasgow
something i read a long time ago had me using the opaque option as standard on func_brushes, until i noticed that sometimes they would cause models to render badly.
like stairs being made into func_walls to stop face splitting at the sides would make the world brush below them dark. then when a player was on the stairs, the model would be lit according to how the dark world brush below the stairs was, or in this case wasn't, being lit.
now i only use the opaque option when i think it will help.
Re: What's better -- func walls on solid, or just plain solid?
Posted by fizscy46 on
Mon Aug 16th 2004 at 5:19pm
334 posts
72 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 16th 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Well, I guess I now know why my RAD takes multiple days to run