ONE on ONE League

<DIV>Many Players have not the time to be in a clan, or want to play a fast match with no long waiting times. Maps are only small or middle size.

Is such one on one league wantet or not ??

Please write what you think about it </DIV>

Would you play in a one on one league

---

Mess with the best, die like the rest

I like your avatar. It's very old school.

I remember playing Pong in 1985, when I first came to the States.

---

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return." -- Toulouse-Lautre, Moulin Rouge

A one on one competition sounds nice. I think I'll join one, if I have sufficient time for it...

---

Create-ivity - a game development blog

I don't like 1 on 1-s :razz:

---

HL2 tutorials 'n' stuff: http://madedog.pri.ee
217.159.236.34:27050 - CSS Server - Clean | koffer.ee

i would play a one on one in css when i get back home in a week. if your really interested PM me with all the details.

---

Bullet Control: $5000 for a bullet.
"I would blow your f**king head off! ...if I could afford it. I'm gonna get another job, start saving some money... then you a dead man!"

i have the idea to create a new league :smile: , but first i must see what the people realy want, before i do something

@ satchmo its old skool :smile: and iam realy old to :wink: 35 years

---

Mess with the best, die like the rest

I don't like 1 on 1-s :razz:

Neither do I, I'm a crowd pleaser and a firm believer of the "two
fight, the third one wins" rule (although gravnading is efficient on
one-on-ones too :biggrin: ).

@ Andrei you are a fragthief :wink:

---

Mess with the best, die like the rest

Well not really since both combatants die :biggrin: . Now THAT is strategy! :wink:

2v2 is best. Get a good m8 who tends to be online when you are and learn all cool double team moves!

---

-[Better to be Honest than Kind]-

i guess it becouse i have alot of time , but i don't realy like 1 on 1 , it's fun for about 2 rounds and then it's just awfully one sided and boring.

Clan matches however are more upto tactics then skills, as people with fairly low skills but great tactics can win a match agains people with high skill and medium/low tactics, this makes 3on3 and 5 on 5 realy interesting to play in my opinion, but it does actualy take up alot of time so i guess not having alot of time would encourage people int oplaying in such a league

---

Hell, is an half-filled auditorium

I'd join, one on one or not.

---

What the Snarkpitters listen to!

i would play a one on one in css when i get back home in a week. if your really interested PM me with all the details.

i say again.

---

Bullet Control: $5000 for a bullet.
"I would blow your f**king head off! ...if I could afford it. I'm gonna get another job, start saving some money... then you a dead man!"

Just played 2v2 in Ground Control II. The others were pretty good, it
was my first time on-line. My mate pulled it off to win the match with
some help of me, so, yeah, I like 2v2... :razz:

---

Create-ivity - a game development blog

I like 1v1 in CS becuase I am very good at sneaking around and only have to focus on one person.

DrGlass said:
I like 1v1 in CS becuase I am very good at sneaking around and only have to focus on one person.

same here but i think that the two people have to be of similar skill other wise its just not fun.

---

Bullet Control: $5000 for a bullet.
"I would blow your f**king head off! ...if I could afford it. I'm gonna get another job, start saving some money... then you a dead man!"

only 16 votes ;(, come on tell me what you think :smile:

---

Mess with the best, die like the rest