Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Crono on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 6:44am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
yeah, this stuff is a little crazy, but you know what? If this ends up putting a dent in Scientology AND the 'chan' community ... I say let it roll, in any case, we win.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 12:56pm
Posted
2008-02-13 12:56pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
I find it kinda bizarre that people find this kind of energy and passion to attack the "Church".
I imagine a whole raft of them wouldn't expend the energy required to vote or take even a passing interest in world affairs much more scandalous than the celebrity cult of scientology...
Nevertheless, it's good to see people working against the crazy "Church". As for people who embrace scientology, it's baffling in comparison to other religions - you can understand why people worship and pray, but Scientology has basically spawned from a load of ill connected ramblings of Hubbarb and hijacked symbols (Christian cross anyone?)
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by thehalflifeman33 on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 8:12pm
127 posts
13 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 4th 2008
Occupation: Battlefield Studios, Hl2Goldsrc.
Location: Canada, BC
what? you don't even make sense. speak english.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by RedWood on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 8:20pm
RedWood
member
719 posts
652 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 13th 2006
It's nice to see them targeting such a organization, but to be fair, scientology supposed beliefs are no more out their than mormonism or catholicism or ect. beliefs. Whats so outrageous is how vicious they are when it come to collecting money form their followers.
The asshole side of me is saying "who cares". If people are stupid enough to believe all that ridicules bull s**t then let a vicious cult destroy them. The only moral issue then is when they bring their innocent children into it. Sad...
Reality has become a commodity.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Snarkmaster on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 8:36pm
33 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 28th 2008
Occupation: snark farmer
Location: U.S.A.
My largely unnecessary two cents: [yep, I'm still floating around, even though you all hate me]
Yeah! Death to Scientology! Don't let them ever make another Battlefield Earth!
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by FatStrings on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 10:05pm
Posted
2008-02-13 10:05pm
1242 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 11th 2005
Occupation: Architecture Student
Location: USA
Scientology is a self help book, it tells people they can benefit from it in this life and they think it's too good to be true
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by thehalflifeman33 on
Wed Feb 13th 2008 at 11:19pm
Posted
2008-02-13 11:19pm
127 posts
13 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 4th 2008
Occupation: Battlefield Studios, Hl2Goldsrc.
Location: Canada, BC
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting Yak_Fighter</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting thehalflifeman33</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>what? you don't even make sense. speak english.</DIV></DIV>
go back to grade school moron
</DIV></DIV>
go back and let your brain process my question moron.
(not sure if it's even going to attempt to, though...)
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by thehalflifeman33 on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 12:20am
Posted
2008-02-14 12:20am
127 posts
13 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 4th 2008
Occupation: Battlefield Studios, Hl2Goldsrc.
Location: Canada, BC
see? even poor reaper doesn't understand.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by CrazyIvanovich on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 12:34am
Posted
2008-02-14 12:34am
24 posts
2 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jul 15th 2007
Occupation: Software Engineer
Location: US
I don't think anyone really "knows" what Scientology is. I mean, you can just call it a money making scheme, as Mr. Hubbard has been quoted to refer to. But even at that...
Pyramid schemes are far more well defined than this church is. As near as I can figure, its basic principles are "divide into cells and thrive in any way possible."
Anyway, I don't think it's worth the effort of attack, either. I'm frankly a little mad at myself for caring enough to write this post. :/
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Cassius on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 8:35am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Widely scorned groups of people tend to disdain the groups their society sees as even more ridiculous and contemptible than they are. Hence why rednecks hate black people. Hence why a circle of racist, homophobic hentai- and child pornography-saturated losers hate Scientologists.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Fjorn on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 9:22pm
Fjorn
member
250 posts
25 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jun 5th 2004
Occupation: Student/Amateur Writer
Location: California - USA
A couple points:
Voting/non voting is not an issue here, as this isn't something that would be subjected to a vote, so I don't see your point about that...
Scientology has already had its website hacked multiple times by "Anonymous"
Other than that... I dunno... there are lots of cults out there that are just as bad as scientology, they just are far less in the public spotlight, and try to avoid deaths...
Signature? What signature!?
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 10:59pm
Posted
2008-02-14 10:59pm
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting Fjorn</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>Voting/non voting is not an issue here, as this isn't something that would be subjected to a vote, so I don't see your point about that... </DIV></DIV>
It's really easy. Imagine if all the effort put into stupid pointless s**t like ddos'ing a Scientology website, posting about cheap foreign children's cartoons, or playing video games etc etc was instead put into political action and trying to wrangle important issues like healthcare, the Iraq war, the US wealth gap, the environment, genocide, starvation and so on. Gwil would probably think the world would be a better place while people like me are just glad that even more idiots (various _chan posters) don't use their political power to help drive the world into the ground faster. :razz:
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 11:29pm
Posted
2008-02-14 11:29pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
I don't think necessarily that think the world would be a better place, I believe in this country at least many many people would vote for the extreme right or radical religious parties, which might shock the governments and mainstream parties into reform.
Unfortunately for the US there is a 2 party system - we have it here also, but votes turning toward the BNP, UKIP, Muslim Alliance etc and having an impact are much more likely. However, people wont vote because they either feel disaffected or run their lives in a bubble of blissful ignorance.
Also, my "point" was actually saddled up with a couple of other things beside voting in elections. It has been read too literally. What I mean is that if people were more concerned about FOR INSTANCE where their meat came from, or, how their local authority wasted money on programme x/y/z, concerned on a scale they are about a 2 bit pseudo religions organisation, society might run a little better and you would have less people engaging with the "Church".
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 11:35pm
Posted
2008-02-14 11:35pm
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
I love you Gwil :redface:
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Thu Feb 14th 2008 at 11:43pm
Posted
2008-02-14 11:43pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
I try, but most of the time i'm just a bastard.
As an amusing side point, one of my fellow 'students' pointed out with glee the campaign by "Anonymous" on "teh internet!!11" - I took up the conversation later and tried to gauge his opinion on early years education and testing, amongst other things. He had a simple, recited opinion which was unable to be expanded upon. Yet Scientology there was much rage for.
What? WHY?! The only reason I expressed an opinion of support for their activities is that at least they are speaking out for something. Perhaps it is a little foolish to hope they will extend the same interest to other subjects..
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 12:26am
Posted
2008-02-15 12:26am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Why should I care about national and world events and issues when I could be watching entertainment news about Britney Spears?!
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 7:11am
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
SIGH, for INSTANCE again. Amongst other things. Crime, the environment and the nature of democracy were also discussed.
Remind me not to try and illustrate points on the internet ever again.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 7:43am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
There there Gwil, nobody reads what other people post anyway. I know I don't.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 8:52am
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Anyone else see the empty space above here? Weird, some kind of plane is attacking the forums.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 10:17am
Posted
2008-02-15 10:17am
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Never mind, you've missed my point which was that he was reciting words opined by the popular press - a recital, as it were. That was my irritation...
Also, you have to keep in mind these topics are/were being discussed as follows the trends in the UK at the time, ie we have the most tested children in Europe, we have the highest youth crime in Europe, the current government won only 22% of the vote, use of SUVs for short runs etc.
Either way, you missed the point, as I say. Hence I will avoid using text to describe arguments or points which clearly need more consideration and comprehension of the context in which they are made - even if it I thought one operative word made it pretty clear the idea that I was trying to convey.
The truly ridiculous thing about anyone subscribing to the anti-Scientology movement in the UK is that it really isn't that big an issue in terms of demographics in the USA, let alone Britain, where it is barely heard of outside of reactionary documentary makers and people with too much time and too little brain on their hands.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by mazemaster on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 10:42am
Posted
2008-02-15 10:42am
890 posts
438 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
Ok. You are saying that the guy you talked to is silly for protesting scientology because there are more important things to do, and I am saying that its actually not that silly because the more important topics are more complicated and harder to take an exact stance on.
Re: The Internets are Going to War
Posted by Gwil on
Fri Feb 15th 2008 at 10:49am
Posted
2008-02-15 10:49am
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Well, no, I didn't say that at all... - the argument about "more important" (this is something you have read from it yourself) wasn't even tied to the person I am discussing - separate posts, separate situations.
I'm saying the guy is a fool for espousing the ill informed opinions of others on Scientology OR current affairs and dressing it up as some kind of valuable contribution or independent thought process.
What's really happening here is you're trying to trip up the arguments with an anally retentive - yet ironically - incorrect reading of what I am saying.