Sector A by KungFuSquirrel

Map Rating

  • 0
  • unrated

Map Download

Map Info

Map Description

Released: July 2001

My largest released map to date and also (of my releases thus far) the most complex. Layout is a bit too loopy, but architecturally I think I got a pretty good recreation of the original Black Mesa feel.

Discussion

Posted by reaper47 on Thu Feb 19th 2009 at 6:00pm

Mini-error:

Probably, when there are 4n+1 maps, there is an empty last page when viewing the 4 thumbnails for maps in the user profiles.

Example:

http://opal.lunarbreeze.com/~snark3/index.php?p=viewprofile&uid=3705&c=1
(click "next page" and it's empty)
Posted by RedWood on Thu Feb 19th 2009 at 4:38pm

When u click view all smillies, it doesn't show the smillies under their text code.
Posted by larchy on Thu Feb 19th 2009 at 2:57pm

fixed
Posted by Riven on Tue Feb 17th 2009 at 9:42pm

When clicking on map images on their profile pages (to open them in a new window or tab) I get only a blank page with the text: "No images available" written at the top.

Here's a link to it: http://opal.lunarbreeze.com/~snark3/pop.php?win=gallery&map=3087&num=2
Posted by larchy on Tue Feb 17th 2009 at 2:37pm

Hmmm :/ Not on my firefox3 they're not
Posted by reaper47 on Tue Feb 17th 2009 at 2:34pm

With the blue theme, the "recent forum posts" and "recent update" boxes on the front page are displayed underneath each other instead of side to side (Firefox 3).
Posted by reaper47 on Fri Feb 13th 2009 at 4:33pm

larchy said:
Unfortunately by default MySQL searches only on words with four or more letters.

This can be changed by setting the variable 'ft_min_word_len', but this is not a dynamic setting that I am able to change. I would have to have access to the MySQL config file, and then restart the web server (and rebuild the database indexes) for the change to take effect... I don't think that's something that is going to happen unfortunately.
Yes, I expected that.

The new search page is much better. The colors are too extreme, though. It's almost hard to read because of the blinding contrast. Maybe darker colours for the underground overlay? Like ### instead of ### and ### instead of ### ...
Posted by larchy on Fri Feb 13th 2009 at 12:38pm

Unfortunately by default MySQL searches only on words with four or more letters.

This can be changed by setting the variable 'ft_min_word_len', but this is not a dynamic setting that I am able to change. I would have to have access to the MySQL config file, and then restart the web server (and rebuild the database indexes) for the change to take effect... I don't think that's something that is going to happen unfortunately.

This is pretty standard tbh.

I had intended to give the search page a bit of love, because as you mention it's pretty nuts'n'bolts right now. Will see what I can do to clean it up.

Edit: starting to improve the formatting, plus a few things under the hood. I don't think the search is too bad really :|

http://opal.lunarbreeze.com/~snark3/index.php?p=search&query=search%20formatting&sec=forumsp
Posted by reaper47 on Fri Feb 13th 2009 at 11:04am

larchy, that browser/IP spying thingy works flawlessly for me.
larchy said:
Anything such as 'I', 'we', 'are', 'for' get assigned extremely low relevancies and tend not to be matched.
I tried searching for common keywords regarding hammer editing (forum posts). It worked for the most part but,

a) the results list was unreadable due to visible tags and lacking formatting.
b) Short but important terms which are common (BSP, HL2, etc) seem to be cut off from the search because they have too few letters.
Posted by larchy on Fri Feb 13th 2009 at 9:12am

aaron_da_killa said:
I searched for "hello" and "Hello" in forum posts and nothing came up. I'm pretty sure that there are multiple threads out there with the word hello in it
I've looked into this in a lot more detail, and I think what is happening is that because 'hello' is a very common word it is probably a)not in the column index, b)is ignored by MySQL's natural language search.

Anything such as 'I', 'we', 'are', 'for' get assigned extremely low relevancies and tend not to be matched.

Try keywords... the search is boolean btw... I might add some instructions on how to use it.