Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Juim on
Sun Feb 4th 2007 at 10:42pm
Posted
2007-02-04 10:42pm
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
You know, There are cycles in the PC gaming world. Vast timely voids of "no new releases", and yet there seems to be a never ending flow of new technology, what with the Core 2 Duos, DX10,Vista(although the jury is still out on that one) all the gizmos designed to go with them,New graphics cards/memory/hard drives, you get my drift. It is during those "no new releases" times that I go through my game stack and look for the games that were cutting edge technology on my last build.
For instance, since building my new rig I have re-played HL2, HL2 episode 1, F.E.A.R,(and its expansion pack), and I am currently about halfway through Doom 3(which I also have the expansion and will probably play after this). I play all of these with everything cranked to the maximum value, and suddenly I am instilled with a Re-appreciation of the craft, and of the games themselves.
While Doom 3 was repetitive at best, it was filled with a never ending series of way cool visuals. And with the bump mapping, and specular,particle effects and all that jazz all turned up, it still makes me go ooh! every so often.\
So, since so many of you have recently upgraded their rigs, what have you re-played/appreciated lately?
Note: If this devolves into another conspiracy theory thread, I'm gonna start kickin some asses around here. :biggrin:
Quote from Nietzsche....God is dead
Quote from God....Nietzsche is dead
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Naklajat on
Sun Feb 4th 2007 at 10:54pm
Posted
2007-02-04 10:54pm
1137 posts
384 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 15th 2004
Occupation: Baron
Location: Austin, Texas
If you liked the visuals in Doom3 you should play Quake 4, it's less repetitive and has cooler enemies and weapons.
I recently installed C&C: Red Alert, have yet to play it. Soon to install UT'99
Edit:
@Orph: Even though FEAR doesn't really look any better it's a lot more taxing than Doom 3 because of higher-res textures and more shader effects. FEAR is lame in any case =/
o
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Juim on
Sun Feb 4th 2007 at 11:14pm
Posted
2007-02-04 11:14pm
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
I don't think I even own Quake 4. I'll download the demo now and see if I like it.
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Andrei on
Mon Feb 5th 2007 at 12:35am
Posted
2007-02-05 12:35am
Andrei
member
2455 posts
1248 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 15th 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Just replayed aitd3. b3st g@me evr!!!11one
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Juim on
Mon Feb 5th 2007 at 12:49am
Posted
2007-02-05 12:49am
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
Just finished Quake 4 Demo, plus I ran around the multiplayer maps. Quite a good looking game I must say. Has that Unreal 2 feel to it, which is a game I enjoyed quite a bit. I think I'll go get it this week. Thanks for the heads up there.
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Juim on
Mon Feb 5th 2007 at 1:24am
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
Since Andrew has worked on this game I have a question. I can't seem to get antialiasing to work on either game. I can play in 1600 x 1200 with everything else maxed, but when I go to set AA to any setting at all it resets my screen size to minimal and resets AA to OFF. How do I do this?
Andrew if you're out there I need an answer.
Also, can I use the 1680 X 1050 setting?
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by Crono on
Mon Feb 5th 2007 at 2:49am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
On a PC R6 Vegas shows its crappyness.
No native widescreen support. No AA or AF ... pretty lame looking. Oh, and if I try to go higher than anything 1200 width it ceases to draw world geometry. It's not my computer, it's the game and there's tons of problems with it. It's sad that the PC version is just ... a pile of heaping s**t. Some serious work needs to be done by UbiSoft to bring the PC version up to par. All of this makes no sense of course, since it's running on Unreal 3 Engine which is built on a PC platform as well as many other platforms, it should port rather seamlessly.
Hopefully an UT3 demo will be out in a couple months! (Or a nice version of GoW on PC ... that doesn't require DX10)
A game that is fairly taxing, even on current machines, is Dark Messiah. I personally really like the game even though almost everyone bashes it to pieces. It will definitely put more stress on your graphics card if you have less than 512MB of ram there. It's on the Source engine, but it's been pretty supe'd up.
I didn't replay any games when I built my new machine, but did try stuff out, I found out that, BF games actually sort of ran (but very poorly), FEAR ran really well, D3 did as well. I've noticed a decrease in performance since I built the machine and I'm thinking that's because of the NTFS file system or something in Windows, since the hardware is fine.
I was able to crank stuff that I couldn't before so I was like "oooh" but that wore off pretty fast. I think, the biggest asset I gained by the upgrade was the ability to smoothly run HD video.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: The Official Re-Appreciation thread
Posted by French Toast on
Mon Feb 5th 2007 at 4:09am
3043 posts
304 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 16th 2005
Occupation: Kicking Ass
Location: Canada
My computer isn't spectacular, so I can't really put AA on anything. But stuff I've replayed on max settings;
Worms Wold Party, an old Robin Hood game by Strategy First (great game btw) and Unreal 2.
Booya.