Re: Recently watched
Posted by Orpheus on
Mon Mar 7th 2011 at 12:28am
Posted
2011-03-07 12:28am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Of a genre it was great. When compared to "The Incredibles" it blew chunks. But that doesn't retract from my earlier statement one iota.
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Mon Mar 7th 2011 at 9:45pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
They're part of the same meta-genre. Namely, action/adventure. So I don't know what you're talking about when you say they're in entirely different genres.
Generally speaking, shit you're saying doesn't make sense, I ask you about it, and you say more nonsense, so whatever.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Juim on
Sat Apr 16th 2011 at 7:11pm
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
Shatner was just about 40 when he took the role of captain in 1966. So yes, he's from their day not ours. (I'm 49 just in case you're wondering). I was 6 when he made Star Trek.
Outlander was OK IMO, not too very technically accurate (Sean Connery as an inter-stellar Marshall is a push to say the least. Perhaps his role in Zardoz was more fitting to his personna), which is what I look for behind story and content in a Sci-fi flick. But I am a wierdo anyways with that stuff. I'm a die hard Trekkie, (I've crashed several of the feature sets, and a couple of the series, Voyager and Enterprise), have set pieces, crew jackets and a butt-load of memorabelia.
One of my favorite Sci-fi movies is "The Fifth Element". I am amazed at the cinematography, and have always thought that a story where the hero and the protagonist never meets was clever to say the least. ALIENS is also a ripping yarn, with some sincere effort put into accurate tech based details. Bladerunner was also amazing. I happened to shoot at several of the local (Los Angeles) locations for that movie, on other projects of course. Attention to detail, and quite believable future tech makes this a great watch.
As for what Crono and Orph are on about, who could say. I do think though, that in an entertainment world seemingly bereft of fresh ideas, Outlander would be an excellent opportunity for a re-make with modern day cinematic effects and a more modern and relevant message.
And in closing, yes, RED was awesome. It's nice to see Willis accepting his age now in his roles, and John Malkovitch's character was hilarious as the conspiracy addled ex-spook, who was more right than wrong. Loved it.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Orpheus on
Sat Apr 16th 2011 at 7:31pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Juim, Connery was in "Outland" I saw it at the drive in when it was new. Outlander is a new movie COMPLETEY unrelated. I am not quite sure where Connery came into this. Personally I don't think he made a good movie at all until after he did Highlander. Excepting his role as 007, he sucked in film. Now however he has a shitload of great movies.
He reminds me of Tom Hanks. Until he did "Forrest Gump" his movies were awful.
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Sat Apr 16th 2011 at 8:17pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Outland with Sean Connery and Peter Boyle is a pretty crappy movie. It's one of those 80s scifi movies that had no budget for story and it shows. Even though it's full of some pretty good actors the whole thing falls flat on its face.
Outlander is a much better movie with Jim Cavezal and Ron Perlman about hunting a "dragon" which is actually some alien creature. It's pretty badass, but not anything amazing. I think the movie's funding just get a axed a bit so they knocked it from theatrical release. But it's got a serious Eaters of the Dead vibe going for it ... and Ron Perlman, who is awesome.
Recently, I watched Operation Endgame, which was pretty funny until they decided to have a cobbled together plot that makes little sense (Rob Corddry is always funny), and I saw Rubber. That was so ridiculous it was great (Plot: a 4th wall breaking melodrama about a tire suddenly coming to life and killing everything in its path with telekinetic powers)
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Juim on
Sat Apr 16th 2011 at 10:05pm
Posted
2011-04-16 10:05pm
Juim
member
726 posts
386 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 14th 2003
Occupation: Motion Picture Grip
Location: Los Angeles
LOL. You are correct Orph. My apologies.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Wed Aug 10th 2011 at 9:25pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
I've watched it since it started. It is a good show, but Season 2 was the best so far.
Season 3 feels like a lot of ground work ... I really suggest that you IMMEDIATELY start Season 4 to not feel sort of ripped off by the way Season 3 ends.
Season 2 also is just one big Easter egg for actual history. Go look up Walter White and plan crashes, as a fan of the show you'd appreciate the dedication to detail on the show-writers part.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by G4MER on
Thu Aug 11th 2011 at 10:50pm
Posted
2011-08-11 10:50pm
G4MER
floaty snark rage
member
2460 posts
360 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 6th 2003
Location: USA
PAUL - its a great movie, very funny, and loaded with many hidden easter eggs, some in your face some not so much.
Your Highness - not the best of movies, but still funny, and what they lacked in some areas they made up with tits and ass.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Sun Aug 14th 2011 at 10:01pm
Posted
2011-08-14 10:01pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Yeah those guys don't make very good movies.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by sgtfly on
Mon Aug 15th 2011 at 9:01pm
sgtfly
member
273 posts
347 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 24th 2005
Occupation: 5 more years of BS and I'm done. WOOHOO!
Location: Batavia,IL USA
Yeah really disappointed in Skyline, what an f-ed up ending.
Though I did just watch Battlle LA and Sucker Punch, B_LA I really liked and I liked S_P too mostly for the CGI.
Light is faster than sound:That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Your riches in life are family and friends, everything else is just a distraction.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 12:17am
Posted
2011-08-16 12:17am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Skyline was more lost potential than anything else ... they're just stuck in the apartment the whole time.
Battle L.A. was alright. It has some big problems. Though I did watch it on August 12th 2011 ... which is the date the movie takes place (coincidence) which was kinda neat.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by sgtfly on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 11:47am
Posted
2011-08-16 11:47am
sgtfly
member
273 posts
347 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 24th 2005
Occupation: 5 more years of BS and I'm done. WOOHOO!
Location: Batavia,IL USA
Facing advanced civ's with our modern day weapons and whpping their butts ....yeah a little far fetched I agree. If you can travel from star to star you have major technology and shouldn't lose to someone alot less advanced.
But that's entertainment I guess.
Light is faster than sound:That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Your riches in life are family and friends, everything else is just a distraction.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Orpheus on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 12:33pm
Posted
2011-08-16 12:33pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
But the fact remains that lead/brass traveling fast enough and impacting with tissue causes damage.
Technology has a hard time dealing with that sometimes. :P
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 8:53pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Most alien invasion movies don't make sense because they want our planet for some feature or resource. For example:
In Battle LA it makes no sense that their technology would be water powered by a pure source (liquid) how would they even developed that in the first place? Even if the idea is that they depleted all the resources in their system ... then they would actually have a better plan for conquest then to just drop in some shock troops. They would take everything by surprise .. .or I don't know siphon off the water secretly.
It's not that I don't want alien invasion war movies ... but like with all Sci Fi it's much more fulfilling if it's plausible or there's truth in it. If it's just stupid, then it's rather difficult to care about what's going on.
I wish there was more realistic awesome sci fi out there. As it stands there's like ... Moon ... and that's it. Sunshine is also good ... but it has it's own trope violations. I'm fine with gimmicks (like the communications array ... or the bomb that starts the sun ... or the clones.) as long as they're used sparingly.
I think most of the issue is people try to simplify their movie's message too much, while making the actual plot overtly complex. Sometimes, a nice simple movie with a powerful message is far better.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by sgtfly on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 10:27pm
Posted
2011-08-16 10:27pm
sgtfly
member
273 posts
347 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 24th 2005
Occupation: 5 more years of BS and I'm done. WOOHOO!
Location: Batavia,IL USA
I think Hollywood is running out of ideas to make movies...especially good ones.
I'm sure you've all noticed all the remakes ...usually bad coming out of the studios lately.
Light is faster than sound:That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Your riches in life are family and friends, everything else is just a distraction.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Orpheus on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 10:37pm
Posted
2011-08-16 10:37pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Yeah, the recent True Grit remake. They could have picked and week or month before the time frame of this movie and made another movie about Rooster Cogburn. I am stumped as to why they chose to remake that one adventure.
I am pretty psyched about the new Planet of the Apes movie. It looks more less fresh from the previews. I hope against hope that they aren't showing the 10 best parts in the previews.
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by sgtfly on
Tue Aug 16th 2011 at 11:49pm
Posted
2011-08-16 11:49pm
sgtfly
member
273 posts
347 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 24th 2005
Occupation: 5 more years of BS and I'm done. WOOHOO!
Location: Batavia,IL USA
LOL....Yeah they sometimes show all the good parts in the trailers and you get disappointed at the show. Did that with cowboys & aliens.
They probably edit and put the film together and go "Well crap that sucks, let's put all the good parts in the trailer and get people to come so we can grab some cash b4 they say it stinks."
Light is faster than sound:That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Your riches in life are family and friends, everything else is just a distraction.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Wed Aug 17th 2011 at 7:49am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Rise of the Planet of the Apes isn't bad. It's biggest problem is it's too much groundwork. It's obvious they have a bigger plan in mind for the franchise, I just wish they covered more in the flick.
If you go into it with the mindset that it's a story about Caesar, you'll be fine.
It also seems to be more re-imagining than prequel, since most of the Ape-lore from the original flicks and the book is violated (and more practical, if you can believe it)
I liked Cowboys and Aliens ... I made sure to see it when it first came out so the ultra-spoiler TV trailers hadn't started yet (I hadn't seen any of the space craft or the aliens at all before seeing the actual flick)
As for True Grit, it was another adaptation of the book, not a remake of the movie.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Crono on
Wed Aug 17th 2011 at 6:35pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
There's a difference!
It's not Cowboys & Aliens the novel (A novelization of a movie that's adapted from a comic book)
It's not a remake of an adaptation. It's an adaptation of a book that had also previously been adapted.
They're not the same thing at all.
Blame it on Microsoft, God does.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by Orpheus on
Wed Aug 17th 2011 at 6:39pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Ok. That cleared that up, not.
Anyway, not worth the time to define further.
I have the book. I have the audiobook (unabridged) I have both movies. That's enough for me.
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: Recently watched
Posted by sgtfly on
Fri May 18th 2012 at 11:48am
Posted
2012-05-18 11:48am
sgtfly
member
273 posts
347 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 24th 2005
Occupation: 5 more years of BS and I'm done. WOOHOO!
Location: Batavia,IL USA
Gotten hooked on Big Bang Theory, funny ass show. Also the Avengers movie was awesome. Loved the way they tied it all together and gave each character their moments. Having Joss Whedon direct it was genius too.
Light is faster than sound:That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Your riches in life are family and friends, everything else is just a distraction.