Quick graphics card question

Quick graphics card question

Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 11:24am
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 11:24am
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
I'm looking for a new graphics card as mine is on the blink, and GeForce FX5700's seem to be in my price range (?120/$200 and under). Is a 5700 ultra with 128mb of memory 'better' than a 5700 with 256mb? Or would people suggest a different card for this sort of price, perhaps a budget 5900XT? (why does the internet make it so hard to research this kind of stuff?!)
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by $loth on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 11:38am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 11:38am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
As far as i know a 5700 XT is a 5700 with a higher clock rate so its faster than a normal 5700 with the same amount of ram, but in this case the extra ram might make it slighty faster than a XT
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by diablo on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 12:18pm
diablo
189 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 12:18pm
diablo
member
189 posts 29 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 19th 2002 Occupation: Guitarist Location: Melbourne, Australia
I hate my FX5600, it's a piece of s**t! It overheats too much even with an extra fan.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by KoRnFlakes on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 12:52pm
KoRnFlakes
1125 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 12:52pm
1125 posts 511 snarkmarks Registered: Jul 3rd 2002 Occupation: Yus! Location: Norfolk
sapphire radeon 9600 pro or XT. 130quid I got my pro for, you can probably get the XT for that now.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by KoRnFlakes on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 12:56pm
KoRnFlakes
1125 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 12:56pm
1125 posts 511 snarkmarks Registered: Jul 3rd 2002 Occupation: Yus! Location: Norfolk
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by wil5on on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 1:24pm
wil5on
1733 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 1:24pm
wil5on
member
1733 posts 570 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 12th 2003 Occupation: Mapper Location: Adelaide
My radeon 9600 pro is pretty good value, even with my crappy CPU and slow bus and RAM, I can still run bf42 in 800x600 with good fps. A big improvement over the GF2 MX200 I used to have...

You seem to be concentrating too much on nVidia. AFAIK, the radeon 9600 is equal to or greater than the fx5700. Then again, I could be wrong. But, the radeon works for me.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:15pm
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 6:15pm
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I highly suggest an ATI card if you're getting one these days. Previously Nvidia was the king, but that's not so anymore.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Wild Card on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:39pm
Wild Card
2321 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 6:39pm
2321 posts 391 snarkmarks Registered: May 20th 2002 Occupation: IT Consultant Location: Ontario, Canada
If the XT is the same card but with a higher clock setting, dont waste the extra money and buy that one. IMO, just get the standard one and overclock it. Provided theres good cooling solution on the card and you dont have hot spots in your case.

If not, I mean, what is the difference between 128 and 256? Its nothing new, just more of the same stuff. The difference between a 5700 and a 5900 = new features. Pretty much all the PGU's are identical. Its just that the 5700 has some features locked that the 5900 dosent. Therefore nVidia can have several different card models ranging from extreme gamer cards to low end game cards without having to waste money making different GPU's for each.

I may be wrong, but I think, for example, the 5200 and the 5900 are essentially the same GPU, but the 5200 is locked out of many features and they lowered its clock setting and gave the card a cheaper cooling feature.

IMO, when looking for a card, the GPU comes first, then the ram.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by fishy on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:50pm
fishy
2623 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 6:50pm
fishy
member
2623 posts 1476 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 7th 2003 Location: glasgow
the reviews that i read put me right off getting the fx 5700. they all seemed to agree that it was a noisy disappointment compared to whatever the equivalent ATI card is.

it was only with the fx5900 that nvidia got there act together with some of problems they had with architecture and cooling, and got there noses in front of ati again.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 8:43pm
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 8:43pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
Thanks guys. Will probably go for an FX5900 and trust in the 'GPU > memory' advice, guess with AGPx8 you can always use system memory in a few years if you need it!
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 9:09pm
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 9:09pm
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Nothing will utilize 256Mb, it's just more money and you'll never know the difference.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 9:09pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 9:09pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Thanks guys. Will probably go for an FX5900 and trust in the 'GPU > memory' advice, guess with AGPx8 you can always use system memory in a few years if you need it!
Yeah ... that wont slow down all your processes at all :rolleyes:

More video card Ram is more important, as always. A video card works just like the rest of your computer. However, if you don't have as much video RAM and a higher Video BUS with a Higher clock speed, it would be possible to run at the same performance level.

Anyway, I don't think you should buy a card based on GPU speed, since it can be overclocked without severe damage.

It also depends on who you get as the manufacturer of the card. But the end choice is up to you, you're the one who has to use it.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 9:22pm
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-13 9:22pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
Gorbachev said:
Nothing will utilize 256Mb, it's just more money and you'll never know the difference.
Where have I heard that before :argh:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by omegaslayer on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 12:46am
omegaslayer
2481 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 12:46am
2481 posts 595 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2004 Occupation: Sr. DevOPS Engineer Location: Seattle, WA
Go to e-bay and get a discount on all graphics cards, although since your in UK and out of America it might raise problems, but in anycase I got my 9800 pro from there for only 250$ from some one in chicago, works great so far. now im not saying spend 250, but you might be able to find something for cheaper on e-bay.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 1:46am
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 1:46am
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I can get a 9800 pro brand new for $320 CDN ($240US).
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 1:57am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 1:57am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Jesus Christ, you'd pay more then $200 (US) for a video card???
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by $loth on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 9:37am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 9:37am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
ATI are better graphics than nvidia, especially if you are going to play HL2, nvidia's memory float point is low compared to radeon graphics cards.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Sim on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 11:06am
Sim
257 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 11:06am
Sim
member
257 posts 96 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 30th 2002 Occupation: Student Location: UK
Tom's hardware guide has some good reviews and comparisons on graphics cards

www.tomshardware.com
and also
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/index.html

Also while I was searching in google I gound this, can't tell if it's true or not

http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=8278

Just some things I dug up, haven't read them properly but they might be of use.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Wild Card on Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 1:54pm
Wild Card
2321 posts
Posted 2004-04-14 1:54pm
2321 posts 391 snarkmarks Registered: May 20th 2002 Occupation: IT Consultant Location: Ontario, Canada
Gorbachev said:
I can get a 9800 pro brand new for $320 CDN ($240US).
Have you looked at what www.oemexpress.com have to offer? Ive gotten most of my parts from there. Just make sure you know exactly what your getting first.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 2:30pm
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 2:30pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
Well, just got a new FX5900, seems to be pretty good but now I need a mobo/processor upgrade :smile: Although, I've had my system clock set to July for the last couple of days (accidentally), and it was causing lots of small artifacts to appear against black backgrounds in IE/games!
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 8:44pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 8:44pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
If anything, you'd probably only want to upgrade the processor and not the mother board. Try maxing out the CPU, BUS, and RAM speeds first.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:00pm
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 9:00pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
That's a bit hard seeing as I have an 'early' Pentium 4, and it's pretty difficult/pointless getting a 1.7Ghz processor off eBay :/
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Kage_Prototype on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:03pm
Kage_Prototype
1248 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 9:03pm
1248 posts 165 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 10th 2003 Occupation: Student Location: Manchester UK
That's a bit hard seeing as I have an 'early' Pentium 4, and it's pretty difficult/pointless getting a 1.7Ghz processor off eBay :/
I had the same problem, a socket 423 instead of the more modern 428 (I think they're the numbers). Meh, I just bought a whole new computer. I wanted a processor type that could handle anything above 2.0Ghz. :razz:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Wild Card on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:55pm
Wild Card
2321 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 9:55pm
2321 posts 391 snarkmarks Registered: May 20th 2002 Occupation: IT Consultant Location: Ontario, Canada
In hick voice:

My friend owns a dell.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:56pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-15 9:56pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
That's a bit hard seeing as I have an 'early' Pentium 4, and it's pretty difficult/pointless getting a 1.7Ghz processor off eBay :/
Ah, nevermind then. I assumed you might of had a newer board, not that I have any clue as to what you currently have ... besides your video card, obviously. assumes, you have a 1.4 Ghz P4 or close to it
I had the same problem, a socket 423 instead of the more modern 428 (I think they're the numbers). Meh, I just bought a whole new computer. I wanted a processor type that could handle anything above 2.0Ghz.
Such as Socket A? (most every 32-bit processor AMD has made to date)
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Orpheus on Fri Apr 16th 2004 at 12:40am
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2004-04-16 12:40am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
slides in a bit of info that could be correct, but should be taken with caution

i have heard, it is very easy to flash the bios of a normal card, with the XT bios of the same model.. in essence, you will be overclocking it... and would need to deal with the heating issues.

in most cases, so i have read, the only real differences between the models, is the bios.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Kage_Prototype on Fri Apr 16th 2004 at 12:42am
Kage_Prototype
1248 posts
Posted 2004-04-16 12:42am
1248 posts 165 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 10th 2003 Occupation: Student Location: Manchester UK
Such as Socket A? (most every 32-bit processor AMD has made to date)
Yup, that's what I have now. :smile:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Fri Apr 16th 2004 at 5:32am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-16 5:32am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Yup, that's what I have now.
Congratulations on finally coming to your senses :smile: (In that Intel chips are just too damn expensive for what they do and their lifespan)
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Fri Apr 16th 2004 at 5:52am
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-16 5:52am
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
pets Socket A
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 5:18am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 5:18am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
In a few years you'll be petting Socket 940 :biggrin:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by $loth on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 6:03am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 6:03am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
Crono said:
In a few years you'll be petting Socket 940 :biggrin:
Yay FX-53's!!!!! :biggrin:

<!-- ZoneLabs Popup Blocking Insertion -->
(Scripts are not allowed!)
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by scary_jeff on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:27am
scary_jeff
1614 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 10:27am
1614 posts 191 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Yes Orph, you can do that in some cases, but not all.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Leperous on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:40am
Leperous
3382 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 10:40am
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts 1635 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 21st 2001 Occupation: Lazy student Location: UK
So here's a questions... we all know that graphics cards can cause 'artifacts' to appear on screen if they're too hot, but what if they're too cold? I'm getting small green and blue dots appearing on programs with black backgrounds (e.g. on this website) for about half an hour, then they seem to disappear...

User posted image

edit okay the bloody fan doesn't work on this one either, which is the same reason I got rid of the old one! :mad:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 7:06pm
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 7:06pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Lep, you might want to check to see if anything in your computer is constricting the card itself. Such as maybe you should move some of your PCI cards around (if you can). Or maybe the IDE cables are getting in the way.

However, if this card is manufactured by ASUS, as your last one was, maybe you shouldn't get ASUS anymore. Maybe your computer isn't supplying enough power for everything you have in it, however, that's pretty unlikely.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 9:44pm
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 9:44pm
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
"And the lord said: 'Why didn't you get ATI?'" I think it's a sign to steer away from Nvidia for a bit :rolleyes:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Tracer Bullet on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:09pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 10:09pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
And man said unto the Lord "because ATI has s**tty drivers and worse technical support"
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:12pm
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 10:12pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
i thought he said "Let there be light" and eve hit adam behind the ear for getting off first.

/runs
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Tracer Bullet on Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:16pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2004-04-17 10:16pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
:lol: .
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 4:27am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-18 4:27am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Gorb, there's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. It just depends on who you get as a manufacturer. Same thing with Radeons. Obviously, people only get ATI Radeons (mostly),but other companies make them as well: ASUS and Diamond included. The point is, If whatever company made his GeForce had instead made a Radeon (or such) It would be just as s**tty. Does that make sense? However, it is easier to find poorly made nvidia cards then it is to find poorly made ati cards, simply because more companies produce nvidia cards. I personally stick with MSI, because I've never had any problems, nor has anyone I know. I've had immense problems with: ASUS and PNY, oh God, PNY ... so bad. Anyway.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Gorbachev on Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 5:34am
Gorbachev
1569 posts
Posted 2004-04-18 5:34am
1569 posts 264 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 1st 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
And I've had no problems with ASUS stuff. For the most part unless a part has a serious problem it's all local issues.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by Crono on Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 7:36am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2004-04-18 7:36am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
Right.

However, most of the problems I had with ASUS was with their motherboards, maybe it was just that model, but it was terrible ... it didn't work ... all 5 of the ones I tried, I must say the store I got them from was pissed off at me. They didn't believe me ... the funny thing is, now they're out of buisness :lol:
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by beer hunter on Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 9:04am
beer hunter
281 posts
Posted 2004-04-18 9:04am
281 posts 602 snarkmarks Registered: Jul 6th 2003 Occupation: Beer taster Location: The Pub
edit okay the bloody fan doesn't work on this one either, which is the same reason I got rid of the old one! :mad:
Some cards turn off the fan in 2D mode or for low temperatures, try a game or other 3D app to increase the temps and then check if it spins up.
Re: Quick graphics card question Posted by $loth on Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 9:15am
$loth
2256 posts
Posted 2004-04-18 9:15am
$loth
member
2256 posts 292 snarkmarks Registered: Feb 27th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: South England
Gorbachev said:
And I've had no problems with ASUS stuff. For the most part unless a part has a serious problem it's all local issues.
I have an asus motherboard, erm...a7v8x-x, i have had no probs with this MB at all, and it goes well with my graphics card :biggrin: