Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Leperous on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 11:24am
Posted
2004-04-13 11:24am
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
I'm looking for a new graphics card as mine is on the blink, and GeForce FX5700's seem to be in my price range (?120/$200 and under). Is a 5700 ultra with 128mb of memory 'better' than a 5700 with 256mb? Or would people suggest a different card for this sort of price, perhaps a budget 5900XT? (why does the internet make it so hard to research this kind of stuff?!)
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by $loth on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 11:38am
Posted
2004-04-13 11:38am
$loth
member
2256 posts
292 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 27th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: South England
As far as i know a 5700 XT is a 5700 with a higher clock rate so its faster than a normal 5700 with the same amount of ram, but in this case the extra ram might make it slighty faster than a XT
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by diablo on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 12:18pm
Posted
2004-04-13 12:18pm
diablo
member
189 posts
29 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 19th 2002
Occupation: Guitarist
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I hate my FX5600, it's a piece of s**t! It overheats too much even with an extra fan.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by KoRnFlakes on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 12:52pm
Posted
2004-04-13 12:52pm
1125 posts
511 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jul 3rd 2002
Occupation: Yus!
Location: Norfolk
sapphire radeon 9600 pro or XT. 130quid I got my pro for, you can probably get the XT for that now.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by wil5on on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 1:24pm
wil5on
member
1733 posts
570 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 12th 2003
Occupation: Mapper
Location: Adelaide
My radeon 9600 pro is pretty good value, even with my crappy CPU and slow bus and RAM, I can still run bf42 in 800x600 with good fps. A big improvement over the GF2 MX200 I used to have...
You seem to be concentrating too much on nVidia. AFAIK, the radeon 9600 is equal to or greater than the fx5700. Then again, I could be wrong. But, the radeon works for me.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Gorbachev on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:15pm
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I highly suggest an ATI card if you're getting one these days. Previously Nvidia was the king, but that's not so anymore.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Wild Card on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:39pm
2321 posts
391 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 20th 2002
Occupation: IT Consultant
Location: Ontario, Canada
If the XT is the same card but with a higher clock setting, dont waste the extra money and buy that one. IMO, just get the standard one and overclock it. Provided theres good cooling solution on the card and you dont have hot spots in your case.
If not, I mean, what is the difference between 128 and 256? Its nothing new, just more of the same stuff. The difference between a 5700 and a 5900 = new features. Pretty much all the PGU's are identical. Its just that the 5700 has some features locked that the 5900 dosent. Therefore nVidia can have several different card models ranging from extreme gamer cards to low end game cards without having to waste money making different GPU's for each.
I may be wrong, but I think, for example, the 5200 and the 5900 are essentially the same GPU, but the 5200 is locked out of many features and they lowered its clock setting and gave the card a cheaper cooling feature.
IMO, when looking for a card, the GPU comes first, then the ram.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by fishy on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 6:50pm
fishy
member
2623 posts
1476 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 7th 2003
Location: glasgow
the reviews that i read put me right off getting the fx 5700. they all seemed to agree that it was a noisy disappointment compared to whatever the equivalent ATI card is.
it was only with the fx5900 that nvidia got there act together with some of problems they had with architecture and cooling, and got there noses in front of ati again.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Leperous on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 8:43pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Thanks guys. Will probably go for an FX5900 and trust in the 'GPU > memory' advice, guess with AGPx8 you can always use system memory in a few years if you need it!
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Gorbachev on
Tue Apr 13th 2004 at 9:09pm
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Nothing will utilize 256Mb, it's just more money and you'll never know the difference.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by omegaslayer on
Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 12:46am
Posted
2004-04-14 12:46am
2481 posts
595 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 16th 2004
Occupation: Sr. DevOPS Engineer
Location: Seattle, WA
Go to e-bay and get a discount on all graphics cards, although since your in UK and out of America it might raise problems, but in anycase I got my 9800 pro from there for only 250$ from some one in chicago, works great so far. now im not saying spend 250, but you might be able to find something for cheaper on e-bay.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Gorbachev on
Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 1:46am
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I can get a 9800 pro brand new for $320 CDN ($240US).
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Crono on
Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 1:57am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Jesus Christ, you'd pay more then $200 (US) for a video card???
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by $loth on
Wed Apr 14th 2004 at 9:37am
$loth
member
2256 posts
292 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 27th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: South England
ATI are better graphics than nvidia, especially if you are going to play HL2, nvidia's memory float point is low compared to radeon graphics cards.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Leperous on
Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 2:30pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Well, just got a new FX5900, seems to be pretty good but now I need a mobo/processor upgrade :smile: Although, I've had my system clock set to July for the last couple of days (accidentally), and it was causing lots of small artifacts to appear against black backgrounds in IE/games!
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Crono on
Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 8:44pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
If anything, you'd probably only want to upgrade the processor and not the mother board. Try maxing out the CPU, BUS, and RAM speeds first.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Leperous on
Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:00pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
That's a bit hard seeing as I have an 'early' Pentium 4, and it's pretty difficult/pointless getting a 1.7Ghz processor off eBay :/
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Wild Card on
Thu Apr 15th 2004 at 9:55pm
2321 posts
391 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 20th 2002
Occupation: IT Consultant
Location: Ontario, Canada
In hick voice:
My friend owns a dell.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Orpheus on
Fri Apr 16th 2004 at 12:40am
Posted
2004-04-16 12:40am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
slides in a bit of info that could be correct, but should be taken with caution
i have heard, it is very easy to flash the bios of a normal card, with the XT bios of the same model.. in essence, you will be overclocking it... and would need to deal with the heating issues.
in most cases, so i have read, the only real differences between the models, is the bios.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Crono on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 5:18am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
In a few years you'll be petting Socket 940 :biggrin:
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by scary_jeff on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:27am
Posted
2004-04-17 10:27am
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Yes Orph, you can do that in some cases, but not all.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Crono on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 7:06pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Lep, you might want to check to see if anything in your computer is constricting the card itself. Such as maybe you should move some of your PCI cards around (if you can). Or maybe the IDE cables are getting in the way.
However, if this card is manufactured by ASUS, as your last one was, maybe you shouldn't get ASUS anymore. Maybe your computer isn't supplying enough power for everything you have in it, however, that's pretty unlikely.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Gorbachev on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 9:44pm
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
"And the lord said: 'Why didn't you get ATI?'" I think it's a sign to steer away from Nvidia for a bit :rolleyes:
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Tracer Bullet on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:09pm
Posted
2004-04-17 10:09pm
2271 posts
445 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 22nd 2003
Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Location: Seattle WA, USA
And man said unto the Lord "because ATI has s**tty drivers and worse technical support"
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Orpheus on
Sat Apr 17th 2004 at 10:12pm
Posted
2004-04-17 10:12pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
i thought he said "Let there be light" and eve hit adam behind the ear for getting off first.
/runs
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Crono on
Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 4:27am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Gorb, there's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. It just depends on who you get as a manufacturer. Same thing with Radeons. Obviously, people only get ATI Radeons (mostly),but other companies make them as well: ASUS and Diamond included. The point is, If whatever company made his GeForce had instead made a Radeon (or such) It would be just as s**tty. Does that make sense? However, it is easier to find poorly made nvidia cards then it is to find poorly made ati cards, simply because more companies produce nvidia cards. I personally stick with MSI, because I've never had any problems, nor has anyone I know. I've had immense problems with: ASUS and PNY, oh God, PNY ... so bad. Anyway.
Re: Quick graphics card question
Posted by Gorbachev on
Sun Apr 18th 2004 at 5:34am
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
And I've had no problems with ASUS stuff. For the most part unless a part has a serious problem it's all local issues.