Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Bewbies on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 10:54am
Posted
2003-10-19 10:54am
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
Sorry lep, I admit that i knew there was a 50/50 chance that you would just delete my post. Although.. neither vash or i ever posted a link to the actual hammer editor. Again, sorry sorry! I just thought more people would like to see the pictures than those who wouldn't =P
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by mazemaster on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 11:03am
Posted
2003-10-19 11:03am
890 posts
438 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 12th 2002
There was a link to the freaking zip file... what do you expect.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Bewbies on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 11:14am
Posted
2003-10-19 11:14am
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
it was a link to the batch of pictures =/
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Leperous on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 11:40am
Posted
2003-10-19 11:40am
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
He posted a link to the editor itself... I'm not pissed off at anyone, but it is Bad and I don't want any kind of legal stuff winging itself my way :razz:
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 12:36pm
Posted
2003-10-19 12:36pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
its a crying ass shame when honest people must resort to dishonesty..
i don't blame lep, but i am really disappointed the choice had to be made..
when it reaches a point, to where PICTURES of a game must be removed, thats just to damned far.
software infringement cannot possibly extend that damned far.. it would be like me taking a picture of stolen money from a bank robbery and getting thrown in jail for stealing.
it would almost be worth it, to go find the file myself and just say "there i got it to assholes"
sighs
removing pictures... thats just sad.
before someone turns this into another flame, i don't want or need to hear your reasons, they are prolly correct, but undesired.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by fishy on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 1:36pm
fishy
member
2623 posts
1476 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 7th 2003
Location: glasgow
i'd rather wait for my birthday and get my cake, instead of getting a bag of flour and six eggs a week or two before it.
:biggrin:
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by scary_jeff on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 4:43pm
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
It's exactly the same as with the UT2K3 leak. Websites were asked to take screenshots offline then and I totally agree.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Dr Brasso on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 4:54pm
1878 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 30th 2003
Occupation: cad drafter
Location: Omaha,NE
well, all i can say is i know how i feel when someone swipes a set of prints, or even parts of them off my work pcs.....angers me....trouble is, ya cant really post armed guards outside yer door to protect the integrity of the code......or can you...??? hmmmm...........
dr Brasso... :dodgy:
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 5:29pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
all i can say, is if we start traveling down the path of removal, we wont have a lot of forums left.. if you get right down to it, a rather large percentage of our content is questionable, IF you are not selective in your choices..
IMO the MP3 issue is a bit more world effecting, but no one thought to remove it.
anyways.. i think we have went around this block a time or two, and since you have 2 kinds of folks whom will never agree on it... what can you do?
i think tho, that i will start bitching about the content, till we stop removing pictures.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Loco on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 5:36pm
Loco
member
615 posts
121 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 29th 2003
Occupation: Student
Location: UK
I thikn the problem Orph is that if you post screens of the HL2 leak, you're basically yelling to the community "I have the leaked version", which leads to certain people begging you to send it to them. This latter part is of course illegal.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Finger on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 5:38pm
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
This seems to be a very specific situation, that somewhat holds the integrity of Snarkpit at stake (respecting the wishes of the creators of the game, in which this site revolves around).
I haven't witnessed any extraordinary censorship here, in the past.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Cassius on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 5:44pm
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Vash posted a "hammer.zip" hosted on SnarkPit webspace, requested, Orph, by you. And how is that not posting a link to the HL2 Hammer?
This is not a question of illegality, this is a question of right and wrong, and I don't see why that's so hard for anyone to grasp... If someone ripped an unfinished map of yours off your harddrive, and then showcased it about the web, playing it and making half-assed judgements about it, you might be pissed, and if you wouldn't, most anyone else would be.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 6:31pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
you are being selective again..
remember it, the next time :/
the choice of topic? unimportant.
if one is alright, and the other not, tis a double standard.
remember who you are talking to, i do NOT acknowledge copyrights, so, your examples are completely misdirected.
i do however understand who's site this is, BUT we are currently NOT talking about ownership, but selective thinking.
i can split hairs with you all day, but if you are going to spout bulls**t like "right/wrong" you need to establish how far you are willing to take that thought.
if you are willing only to acknowledge software piracy, and overlook music piracy, then YOU are the wrong person to have a sayso.
i at least feel they are the same, even if i fail to acknowledge they are indeed wrongs.
are we talking censorship? not really, at least i am not.
if anyone else is, you need to avoid my conversation, cause its not about that subject presently.
i can however switch topics to it, cause i have a hard-on for anyone committing that sin.
censorship is worse than piracy, by a long shot.
chose your topic, do not attempt to blend them all into one.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Gollum on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 6:38pm
Gollum
member
1268 posts
525 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 26th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Oxford, England
I think the real reason it had to be removed is simple: Lep doesn't want any phone calls from HL2 lawyers.
Seems sensible to me shrug.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Gorbachev on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 7:02pm
1569 posts
264 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 1st 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Having movies and songs that are already out is also a little different than releasing information of a product that is in development. You're just lucky this isn't the government because if you posted schematics to their newest weapon you'd be dead before you finished reading this post. VALVe hasn't made their money yet, song writers and movie makers have. Don't throw this stuff around here, I support removing pictures and files of it 100%.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Bewbies on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 7:26pm
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
I didn't post the pictures to say, "hey look, i have the leak!". For those of you that saw them when they were up, they showed detailed explanations of many new features in hammer. I felt that since i had already taken the risk of getting the leak, i could satisfy some your guys' curiosity by simply giving info.
BUT... i'de be lying if i said that i didnt know in my mind that it was wrong. I knew there was a chance lep wouldn't like it, but i posted it anyway. I didn't know vash had posted the actual hammer exe.. lol dewd vash! Anyway... like i told gollum once;
Dragons and tigers will never completely agree =P
now seriously guys, i'de much rather this thread just stop. I just wanted to apologize for what i did - not raise the whole question of whether or not i should have been able to do it.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 7:32pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
don''t swaet it tim, things are slow and boring around here, why else would a stupid thread like this progress so far :smile:
besides, i know i am right, everyone else knows it to, once they stop to actually read what i wrote.
seriously tho, aren't those some cool screenshots of that mountain fortress :smile:
anyways, the only important thing is, lep felt the need to remove them, and did.. end of that portion... now on to the music threads :dodgy:
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Orpheus on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 7:39pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
maps?
uhh, you lost me..
MSN is now on
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Bewbies on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 7:39pm
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
just click on the link you dolt
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Gollum on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 8:02pm
Gollum
member
1268 posts
525 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 26th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Oxford, England
whispers
Private Messages
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Gollum on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 9:05pm
Gollum
member
1268 posts
525 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 26th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Oxford, England
Wow :eek:
I especially like the rocky roof - it feels very realistic and detailed without actually having much fine brushwork.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 11:43pm
Posted
2003-10-19 11:43pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
How many wheelbarrows of talent do you need to create something like that? :smile:
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Sinner_D on
Sun Oct 19th 2003 at 11:54pm
Posted
2003-10-19 11:54pm
376 posts
115 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 11th 2002
Occupation: Freelance mapper
Location: Sandiego, CA
i dont mean to anger anyone, but i myself felt the need to check out the screens, according to one i saw, WAD files are nolonger in-use as of HL2 and that now .vmt, and .vtf files would be the replacement... does anyone know wtf these files are, and if this is going to complicate wad creation?
P.S. from the looks of the screens, atleast the ones i saw, this leak looks to be nothing but a hype boost for the LONG delayed HL2. wasnt anything major that i hadnt already seen. :wink: however im rather priviledged :biggrin:
P.S.S LOL gl with your battle for non-selective-ness around here orph. :wink: copywrites are the work of the devil lol
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Sinner_D on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 12:16am
Posted
2003-10-20 12:16am
376 posts
115 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 11th 2002
Occupation: Freelance mapper
Location: Sandiego, CA
dont get me wrong orph... i wasnt pointing fingers or blame, or anything at anyone.
"i dont mean to anger anyone"
if anything i was attempting to jump on the non-selective bandwagon :wink: i totally agree that while lep has the right to do whatever he wants to this site, it is rather hypocritical that he doesnt do the same for all things that may bring lawyers to his door.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Sinner_D on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 12:51am
Posted
2003-10-20 12:51am
376 posts
115 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 11th 2002
Occupation: Freelance mapper
Location: Sandiego, CA
my god...i think thats a first for SP...or atleast a record...lmao
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Cassius on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 1:43am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Everything looks fine, but uh, bucktooth dragon?
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Finger on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 3:56am
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
lol Cas.. Still WIP, so who knows, maybe he will visit the dentist before it's done.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Loco on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 7:04am
Loco
member
615 posts
121 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 29th 2003
Occupation: Student
Location: UK
In response to Sinner_D's question, .vmt files are like mini wad files for each individual texture. They contain bump mapping info, surface sounds etc. and the texture itself. These .vmt files can then all be put into .zip files which act like you're standard wad package.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Bewbies on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 7:40pm
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 10th 2003
Occupation: IT Dude
Location: US-of-A
oye, forgive me for giving more hl2 info... but i want to clear up the vmt/vtf thing. vmt files are just 1k txt files that act as controllers for vtf files. The vtf files actually contain the texture itself - but hammer looks for the vmt files because they contain all the info on a single texture. for example, a blend texture consists of one vtf file. That vtf file, however, points to two or more textures to be used for the blend. This is also used with bumpmaps and envmaps, like loco already told ya ; ).
Basically, a vmt isnt a pack, but directions on where the texture is.
Hope this clears things up ; )
:braces for a caining::
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Finger on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 8:23pm
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
I wonder if we are going to be able to bake all of these things (sounds, textures, skymaps, models) into the bsp? It would be nice to not worry about making sure all the resources go to the right folders.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Monqui on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 8:29pm
Monqui
member
743 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 20th 2002
Occupation: Poor College Student
Location: Iowa, USA
on the one hand, I would hope so- but from their point of view, if it is only stashed insinde the map file that will use it, it makes for a poor design structure.
Look at it this way- say they have a model for a tree that shows up in more than one area of the game. Which would be more sensible? Having one copy of the tree stored in some folder on the comp, or have each map that uses the tree store the tree in the map itself?
I'm sure they will allow some more integration, but I wouldn't bet on it being all inclusive like most people want.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Finger on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 8:47pm
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Well, I remember them talking about a sort of zip file for map resources, so possibly it will just bake (I just love that term for some reason) the files into whatever map format they use, and distribute them to the right folder - discarding any redundancy.
Re: Sorry sorry
Posted by Hornpipe2 on
Mon Oct 20th 2003 at 8:58pm
636 posts
123 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 7th 2003
Occupation: Programmer
Location: Conway, AR, USA
Finger is talking about a -wadinclude, but for everything. You don't HAVE to wadinclude. It's a stupid idea if you're using the same wad for multiple maps - hl.wad isn't included into any of the HL maps, that'd be a poor decision. But if I make one map with one custom texture or WAV or whatever, I don't want to distribute them separately, it's just too much work for all involved.