/me gets indignant, cause you all are deliberately playing dumb :razz:

go back, re-read Hugh's reply.. and forget reno replied at all and it will make perfect sense :biggrin:

/me joins the general confusion

sighs

it wasn't a joke, read hughs RANT.. i was laughing at him :cool:

Orph apparently explained that WAD's can be bypassed right before you. I'm not sure if that's hilarious enough though. :smile:

this once, it wasn't a joke, i was laughing at Hugh's comment about no one critiquing his map because of a missing wad..

all i meant was, you can circumvent a missing wad, but you cannot a model (to my knowledge)

anywho's, as i said, you were thinking correctly, but reading my words wrong..

tis no biggie :razz:

/me looks up as Orph's joke goes right over his head...

Sorry mate, I've re-read it numerous times now and I still haven't a clue what the joke is :biggrin:

Thanks for pointing it out, I award you a gold... award. :kitty:

hey ! i've won something :biggrin:

/edit - it doesn't seem to be using any textures from hugh_issues.wad ? ...lol

Some nice curved wall action going on in the room with the 4 rooflights. I would retexture the railings tho' with something more detailed that looks nicer.

ReNo said:
I'm confused, how couldn't you just bypass a model the same way as a wad, by renaming another model to replace the missing one?

Anyway, I'll try and take a look later on today :smile:

slow down duncan, read it again.. :razz:

you are thinking it right, but reading it wrong :biggrin:

I'm confused, how couldn't you just bypass a model the same way as a wad, by renaming another model to replace the missing one?

Anyway, I'll try and take a look later on today :smile:

missing wads, can be bypassed.. its not as if it were a model missing (<--which cannot)

[edit] message editted for duncan[/edit]