Micheal Jackson

Just watched the live broadcast, MJ is not guilty on all charges!

w00t.

And now the question is: was this outcome the result of the power of money (namely bribery) or of the power of truth.

I very much doubt they were bribed, for one michael is practically broke.

...he is?

yeh he is I heard that he's been spending something like $3 million more than he's earnt

---

Tinterweb site
Deviantart

Human knowledge belongs to the world

I think he is Guilty, but either the proscution didnt make the case
with out a doubt, or they jury was worried about the MJ fanaics and
thier lives, or maybe both. Ahh who cares.. let the little freak be
free.. he would of been dish of the day in prosion.. not that he
wouldnt deserve it.. but Death by Hookie pookie.. OUCH!

Which, considering he owns a significant portion of the Beatles' music catalog, means he just doesn't understand money.

One can be not innocent and yet still be not guilty guys..

Michaels biggest defect is that he keeps getting caught in questionable situations. I doubt very much that he actually did anything wrong.. The problem with the word "Wrong" is it is open to to many interpretations. What I consider wrong, may not even cause a ripple for others, and what still others consider wrong I would consider criminal...

I say he is innocent of all charges, but say honestly, had he been convicted of anything that the parents of these children share the punishment since ultimately THEY are the only ones responsible.

---

The best things in life, aren't things.

its realy as i thought (in my head)

Ill keep it short and simple: The kids were
attempting to get money of him becuase they sore a chance too, the last
case that was "meant to happen" he payed them off with money, i think
they were hoping for the same. In other words there trying to get money
from him.

That said, he is a still a bloody wacko, just look
at his bloody skin colour and nose, i mean the skin colour is a
possable desease but his nose LOL you must be joking, thats no desease.

Edit: Not realy short and simple x.X

---

i don't doubt that he'd have been burned at the stake in the good old days.....

---

i eat paint

but his nose LOL you must be joking, thats no desease.

It...fell off...once ROFL.

<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting fishy</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>i don't doubt that he'd have been burned at the stake in the good old days.....</DIV></DIV>

Don't doubt it meself, but thinkin on it, just how many "life choices" wouldn't have landed someone in hot water in days gone by? (for you assholes about to bitch, there are other life choices besides the fudge packin kind :rolleyes: )

Our life today... It would make the soldiers of old turn over in their graves. I can just imagine.. If it were possible to describe today, to someone in the trenches, just how many would have gone A.W.O.L?

Personally, I won't ever go to war for a such. :/

---

The best things in life, aren't things.

It used to be morally allowed to have sex with small boys at one time in history.. the Romans were well known for this fact.

Just goes to prove if your rich, and a wack job, you get to get away
with just about anything and live in big fancy houses.. if your poor
and a wack job, your in some padded cell wishing to be free. Gotta love
the power of money.

Like I said on MSN messenger to one of the SnarkPit crue.. I think he
is Guilty. But hey I was not on the jury.. so my voice in this matter
does not count..

You're right, Money - it doesn't. These twelve people were a thousand times more informed about this case than anyone else in the country. Their judgment is more valuable than ours.

I've said it on numerous occasions, and hey! I'm going to say it again:

If Michael Jackson wasn't a millionare and was simply some guy who
lives in your town, we would not even be having this discussion. Its
quite obvious that his money and fame got him off the hook -whether or
not he was guilty/not guilty isn't even applicable, in any other case
of child molestation that evidence would have sent him down.

To be honest I've lost interest in the whole thing; he's a nonce and
the parents were as guilty as him, pimping out their child for sex then
trying to get a story out of it. I don't care WHO someone is, be it
Ghandi or the Dali lama, if a grown man asks you to let your kids sleep
over, you obviously say no.

Good music though. :wink:

[edit: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/southern_counties/4090216.stm

OH NOES!!! (for all you non-uk chaps, he's probably the best known
footballer ever, over here, who is also a severe alcoholic. WTF is it
with fame and shagging kids?]

Now that the MJ case is over they will need someone else to pimp.

Pray tell how money and fame got him off the hook, given that the jurors will now slide back into obscurity? Are you suggesting they were dazzled by his beautiful face, or that they were bribed?

I think Mike would enjoy his time in jail if he went. This was like a
win win situation. In jail you can get it up the ass all day from guys
in the shower. "Ooops I dropped my soap, Tyrone I'm bending over TEHEHE"

And being innocent gets him out of the problem. He can just go home and
get it up the ass from his little boys. Either way I think he is guilty.

---

http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/8521/windows981dk.jpg

Nickelplate is my dad

Well after watching FOX news this morning and seeing the interviews
with the jury members. One lady said.. the mother snapped her fingers
at us, i was not about to let her get away with that... And another
said I think he is guilty, but they just didn't prove it.. they let
this guy walk. What a bunch of dumb asses this jury is/was.

I hope you don't get all your news from Fox. If you do I'd suggest trying some more impartial, less sensational, news services.

---

Ham and Jam Contributor
http://www.hamandjam.org

'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'

<DIV class=quote>
<DIV class=quotetitle>? quoting Windows 98</DIV>
<DIV class=quotetext>I think Mike would enjoy his time in jail if he went. This was like a win win situation. In jail you can get it up the ass all day from guys in the shower. "Ooops I dropped my soap, Tyrone I'm bending over TEHEHE"

</DIV></DIV>

You guys make me wanna scream sometimes.. You don't know a f**king thing about child molesters and yet you persist in running your mouths as if you did.

growls

/me avoids, before I go off on someone.

---

The best things in life, aren't things.

Pray tell how money and fame got him off the hook, given that the
jurors will now slide back into obscurity? Are you suggesting they were
dazzled by his beautiful face, or that they were bribed?

Firstly, no they won't, lep, they're all free to sell their stories
(notice how quickly ALL of them came out to the cameras?) which, no
doubt they'll all have a shot at.

Point is, if MJ was a normal nonce and not american royalty, his trial
would have had far less scrutiny, and he'd be in jail right now. After
some consideration, I now feel that the jury did the right thing; he's
obviously a nonce, but in this case the evidence wasn't water tight.

However, that same evidence would have put anyone else in prison, or as fishy mentioned, a good ol' nonce barbeque.

His lawyer says that he won't be having any of his famous sleepovers anymore. Alls well that ends well... :\

You guys make me wanna scream sometimes..

I hope 'you guys' was directed at win98 and his ilk, and not everyone-but-you, or I'll be going off on someone as well.

Scratch that, I'll assume the former. :smile: <span style="text-decoration: line-through;"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"></span>

</span></span>

I just reckon hes got some psychological problems tbh. I mean cumon he even had that kid from home alone in his bed! He just has an extremist view in a very wierd situation which some condem as being horendously wrong- which it may be. At the end of the day, the parents of the children knew they were in his bed, so they are trying to take advantage of someone who cares alot about kids and has a mental disability.

Is it right to take advantaged of mentally handicapped people? He blatantly needs help- and because he was so rich he was able to avoid having to see psychiatrists.

---

-[Better to be Honest than Kind]-

oooh, he needs help, waah waah waah

I paraphrase :razz:

You're not listening. HE IS A NONCE. HE HAS SEX WITH CHILDREN, AND ONLY
THE WORST PARENTS ON EARTH WOULD EVER, EVER WILLINGLY LET THEIR KIDS
SLEEP WITH ANYONE.

Now, WALK AWAY. Don't over analyse poor poor Michael, just because
we've seen documentries on him and what a bad childhood he had.

If we all keep feeling sorry for these people we'll be releasing
Charles Manson , or Peter Sutcliffe because they had it hard. It's
really not something you can 'see from the nonces point of view'. Get
out of the head of a paedophile and pull the switch on him.

Mephs said:
Scratch that, I'll assume the former. :smile: <SPAN style="TEXT-DECORATION: line-through"><SPAN style="TEXT-DECORATION: line-through"><SPAN style="TEXT-DECORATION: line-through"></SPAN>
</SPAN></SPAN>

Safe bet..

---

The best things in life, aren't things.

He got off with each child in his bedroom and then he got off for each one again in court! WHEEEEEE

---

I tried sniffing coke, but the ice cubes kept getting stuck in my nose.
http://www.dimebowl.com