I'd like to respond to a few of the personal observations by Orph if I may....
To note, I realize this may not be the best thread to respond to these in but regardless, it's been a while since the post I'm referencing as been added, and instead of making a new thread I'd like to keep this post succinct.
A few concerns I've denoted:
Orpheus said:
Its all symptomatic of the real issue. Its not so much that spirit is low. Its more that people are into themselves much more.
I have two counter-arguments to this personal observation. One: When there are a lack of posts, how do you
know it has anything to do with people being more or less
bothered with or as you put it "into" themselves? Two: Why are the lack of posts considered a bad thing, or negative aspect on the site? I do not think this is an obvious assessment.
Orpheus said:
Even though it may mean nothing to Riven one way or the other, we owe it to our site to say and do something even if for no other reason than its something you're supposed to do just for being here.
I am quite offended sometimes when I'm referred to in so many words as "not caring" as I have translated the above comment to mean, when referring to site specific issues involving member activity. Yes Orph, I realize what I have told you in outside conversations about me not minding if my interviews didn't receive comments, but to not care one way or the other would not only be an exaggeration, but a grotesque one leaning within the falsity camp.
I do indeed care about what comments I receive, and I make sure to read any and all of them, but what I said and I'll reiterate it here: I'm not going to fret if I don't get any. They are not an accurate measure to the success of the interviews, therefore, I don't relate them to that factor. They are an optional feature, just like the rating system.
Orpheus said:
People here seem to forget that the pages show the times viewed, so you can get a feel for just how many people are so into themselves that they cannot even be bothered to say "Fuck this shit"
Again, it appears to me that the only statistic being exemplified is the number of views on a topic and somehow, you infer that to mean: There must be too many people not feeling bothered enough to post because they must be too "into themselves" to post? I'm looking at the same number and don't read that at all.
I may be fairly young (22), but if there's one thing I've learned about people and text-based messaging (forum, phones, FB, etc...) is that the practice of sending a message to someone means you have to encode your thoughts and feelings into a language or coded message that someone else will be able to understand and decode so they may understand what you meant. The thing with texting is that it's not so great at encoding emotion, which plays a big role in human communication. Emoticons help, but they only go so far...
So when an emotion on a topic is not properly translated, the receiver is left with little to decode in regards to that emotional intent, so what ends up happening is on a very subconscious level, the mind adds emotion to an otherwise emotionless message to give it semblance to the reader, and thus an encoded text message may be read very differently by multiple people, depending heavily on what mood or preconceived outlook they may have on a matter. I think that is the case here. We are looking at facts and figures and attempting to make sense of it all, when in fact, we have no other evidence to coincide with those figures. What sense does it make to talk personal reasoning and motive behind supposed requested responses, when those reasons range much farther than your own culture and age?
I'm not afraid to admit I don't know why there weren't more comments on those interviews. I wish there were, but I'm not going to dream of reasons why people didn't post.
I just felt I needed to respond to these qualms instead of leaving it all with a stale taste in anyone's mouth. Perhaps I'm rambling again, but I hope some of that rambling made sense to you my friends?
Blog:
www.playingarchitecture.net
LinkedIn:
Eric Lancon
Twitter:
@Riven202