Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Wed May 12th 2004 at 10:57pm
Posted
2004-05-12 10:57pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
Duncan, is your option to add a new map there in the control panel? It's just blank under maps in mine.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by scary_jeff on
Wed May 12th 2004 at 11:14pm
Posted
2004-05-12 11:14pm
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Why does it say "please update map details" by one of my maps?
The 'basic' theme needs to be marked with a *, because it doesn't work :smile:
Add those smilies!
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by ReNo on
Wed May 12th 2004 at 11:20pm
Posted
2004-05-12 11:20pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
I've got the add new map option sat there, no problems I can see. And jeff didn't you read my post? :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 9:25am
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Heh sorry, should be fixed :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 12:28pm
Posted
2004-05-13 12:28pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
Yeah, all good now. Thanks. :biggrin:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Orpheus on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 12:56pm
Posted
2004-05-13 12:56pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
hears flogging sound anew
we are still getting map screens uploaded above 100k.. is there not some realistic way to prevent this? one that does NOT rely on these peoples ability to comprehend compassion?
personally, i am considering starting a humiliation thread, one dedicated to people so hard headed that they fail to realize 100k images are the extreme upper limit..
yeah, /me considers it strongly.. maybe a bit of finger pointing will straighten them up :sad:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by scary_jeff on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 1:18pm
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
PHP does have functions to adjust the quality of images, but that doesn't help when the image isn't hosted on the snarkpit. It is also possible to copy an image from a remote location, then get it's file size.
Perhaps when you post with images, it could copy these images from the reomte location to the server, and if any of them are too big, a window pops up with a <100K jpeg version of the image for the user to upload to their webspace? This is definately feasable, but it sounds like more effort than it's worth...
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Orpheus on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 1:25pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
IMO, if the images do not fall within the perscribed criteria, you cannot use them.. period.
why should people care if a 600k image is hosted someplace else? its still 600k
IMO, if you cannot post screens well below 100k, you obviously don't care, and neither should we..
snarkpit should be able to decide whats acceptable, and veto the rest..
100k is the extreme upper limit.. 50k is preferred..
why extend consideration to people who are obviously not worthy..??
the point here is, we hare having to discuss something easilly solved, and past due in solving.. if it cannot be done with code (looks at lep for confirmation of this) the links should be removed.. with a warning to the author..
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 2:19pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Sorry, meant to use some sarcasm tags there really, didn't mean it in a bad way (hence smiley). Making the website automatically convert images is much easier than getting people to do it themselves and having warning message etc., and I certainly wouldn't appreciate you doing a naming and shaming campaign anyway :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Gwil on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 3:25pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
It happens (more than you think!), not sure how - usually linked to zips off scratched cd's/corrupt archives/incorrect usage of archiving program :smile:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 6:16pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Well in this case it was my FTP program not uploading the file :/
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by ReNo on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 6:34pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
It probably just defined the file as there, sort of said "create these files", but then never got around to actually copying the contents from Lep's computer to the newly created forklift.zip. So the file exists, and the extension shows it is a zip file, but the file is actually empty.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by $loth on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 6:35pm
$loth
member
2256 posts
292 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 27th 2004
Occupation: Student
Location: South England
The zip wants empty for me, it had xen_forklift.mdl in it. If you want i could put it on my webspace to download. All you have to do is ask if you want something hosted. [as long as it isnt to big :razz: ]<!-- ZoneLabs Popup Blocking Insertion -->
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 9:51pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Er, you can actually make an empty zip file anyway, in XP you just click new ? ZIP file, or just delete all the contents of one...
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Thu May 13th 2004 at 9:57pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Unless you, say, cut the contents of a ZIP file out and paste them somewhere, or just happen to notice there's an option to create a new ZIP file along with texts, WADs and other formats when you right click..?! :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Sun May 16th 2004 at 3:08pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Just had a thought, instead of simply having page numbers in forums wouldn't it be better if mods/topic starter could 'name' them, i.e. have chapters to a thread too? Be quite useful for longer conversations and map threads (start a new chapter with a new build or with new screens, or have multiple chapters to this thread such as one for bugs and one for suggestions, etc.)
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by scary_jeff on
Sun May 16th 2004 at 3:43pm
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Wow yeah that sounds great! I think letting the poster specifiy new chapters in the mapping thread would be good, but in the general thread, not so good, because the poster could annoy poeple by 'having the last word' in a given chapter, then starting a new one. I know it sounds petty, but in addition to this, half the fun of the general forum is that threads go way off topic - 'chaterising' them would seem to take away from this slightly
I think threads in the editing forum would need to be chaptered by the mods, so when some newbie has asked two questions in the same thread, a mod can come along and make the second question the start of a new chapter within that thread, which could make that question come up seperately when somebody searches the 'answers database' (The same as if the person had started a new thread for their second issue).
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Sun May 16th 2004 at 3:59pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Well, chapters could just be left open anyway and not locked, so it wouldn't work like that. I guess it would be just 'threading' a topic but keeping replies linear... gets to work
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Wild Card on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 2:26pm
2321 posts
391 snarkmarks
Registered:
May 20th 2002
Occupation: IT Consultant
Location: Ontario, Canada
Just noticed the new control panel feature for the maps. Really cool. 'cept when the download counter reaches 3 digits, its placed under the download icon instead of on the side. Just a little point.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by ReNo on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 3:21pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
Did you change the snarkmark formula? I've dropped a few hundred, which isn't an issue, just something I noticed...though it has made me a mere "rabid snark" :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 5:39pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
I did change it slightly, yes, but turns out that it hadn't been adding on any marks for people's comments before so it wasn't just a negative alteration :razz:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 5:52pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
cough
Chapters and reviews. :biggrin:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 6:47pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Well that would make him the highest rated user then, wouldn't it :smile: Perhaps you would like to suggest where the line should be drawn?
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 6:53pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
I thought it used somehow incorporate the amount of ratings too, sorry.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Leperous on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 6:59pm
Leperous
Creator of SnarkPit!
member
3382 posts
1635 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 21st 2001
Occupation: Lazy student
Location: UK
Well it does, but... but... pets Mr Manson some more
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 11:38pm
Posted
2004-05-18 11:38pm
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
In England it's a slang term for a vagina.
In this context it means much the same thing as prick though, but less severe.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by ReNo on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 11:40pm
Posted
2004-05-18 11:40pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
I would class them as equal in severity personally...but both are normally used on people in jest from my experience.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Kage_Prototype on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 11:42pm
Posted
2004-05-18 11:42pm
1248 posts
165 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 10th 2003
Occupation: Student
Location: Manchester UK
It's basically c**t-lite, i.e. the type you can call your friends for a laugh. :smile:
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by Orpheus on
Tue May 18th 2004 at 11:53pm
Posted
2004-05-18 11:53pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
ok, let me clarify, cause all of you missed my point..
1) prick can mean dick/penis... but i used it as prick=annoyance/thorn which is another valid definition.
2) lep got mad cause of term prick.
3) twat can mean vagina, but in this case i am unsure as to leps terminology, so i put ours, which is puss or sissy.
4) should dave get as mad at lep, as lep got at me? and should we retract leps admin privileges for such?
hence.... my inquiry..
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on
Wed May 19th 2004 at 12:00am
Posted
2004-05-19 12:00am
1976 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 9th 2001
Well I just said that twat was less severe than prick so that nullifies point number 4.
Duncan, if you were pissed of at someone you'd be likely to call them a prick but not a twat, at least in my experience.
Re: Site suggestions/bugs
Posted by ReNo on
Wed May 19th 2004 at 1:55am
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
Hmm, I don't know if I would, I'd be more likely to resort to far more inflammatory words :biggrin: But out of those, perhaps prick is slightly more insulting...but its a really close call.
Orph - Lep said it with a smiley, and it was obvious it was meant as a joke, so no :smile: