Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Hugh on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 4:19pm
Hugh
member
900 posts
207 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 25th 2003
Occupation: College Student
Location: Amerika
The fact that they're able to churn out crappy games is because people are willing to buy it. "Oh my gawdz The Sims rox lolelrz it's just like real lifez0r!?!~1" Or something similar.
So even if they are rat bastards who deserve nothing better than to be smothered in the fiery brimstone of El Diablo, the people who buy it are equally rat bastards.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Andrei on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 6:07pm
Andrei
member
2455 posts
1248 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 15th 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
I predict that, in less than 20 years, all games will sound like Barbie Adventures 15: Ken's Revenge, Socky Sock and Homosexual Pirate Island and I was a teenage monkey's-bladder etc.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by pepper on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:03pm
pepper
member
597 posts
80 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 25th 2004
Location: holland
omg, when will it stop that they buy up good company's!
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by xconspirisist on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:04pm
307 posts
81 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 26th 2003
Occupation: Student
Location: UK
EA are the suck imo. I read somewhere an article written by an employee detailing the way that EA treat's its software houses, Infact I think it may even of been KFS that posted the link in the first place.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Gwil on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:12pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
It was, it was someones livejournal which told of how EA basically
blackmail people into rushing out projects under hard conditions. Nasty
company, mostly terrible games and overuse of licences and not quality
software to sell games.
It's a shame to see another company swallowed up (partially) to EA's
Microsoft-esque ways. Can't say i'm too surprised that it's Ubisoft,
correct me if im wrong but their lack of quality titles recently
(ever?) probably means financial rocky ground, and inevitably takeover..
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Crono on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:15pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Maybe you guys are forgetting that UbiSoft almost has worse buisness practices then EA.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Gwil on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:17pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
How can we forget something we didn't know? :razz: All I knew about Ubisoft
is that they make s**t games, cept maybe Prince of Persia - even the
sequel to that is a crock of s**t though.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:20pm
751 posts
393 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Game Design, LightBox Interactive
Location: Austin TX
Buh? Ubi has recently published, developed, or is publishing, games including the following:
beyond good and evil
prince of persia sot/ww
far cry
brothers in arms
r6 series
Even if you don't like these games, we're talking huge successes financially. They run multiple MASSIVE development studios (something like 500-600+ in their Montreal studio across multiple teams) and wrapped up in there have some of the top minds in the industry (well, Michel Ancel :razz: ).
As someone pointed out on another forum, what happens now is this: Ubi stock has surged from the buyout by EA. This is going to make a lot of people sell their shares and take the profits. Then EA snaps up what's left. And poof. And I don't expect the results will be good.
Ubi, Activision, and Take Two are the only ones that come to mind as being able to challenge the EA publishing machine. And if EA's going to pick them off one by one...
flies Activision flag high
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Crono on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 7:20pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
UbiSoft has some games I like, Gwil ...
It's just, when you sign a contract with UbiSoft (apparently) it has an
article that
says once you no longer work there you cannot work at any other game
company for five years. They basically black list your name. In a five
year span, you're basically f**ked. So, I don't know if you
would consider that better or worse then EAs slave labor-ing.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Gwil on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 8:16pm
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
315 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Occupation: Student
Location: Derbyshire, UK
LOL Crono.
I'm pretty sure there is ways to do that in the UK as well. Just
because the US is the evil empire, it doesn't make us "civilised"
European states completely infallible - far from it in fact.
It's not international law that dictates stuff like that, its the ruthless and vindictive nature of capitalism.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Adam Hawkins on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 8:40pm
858 posts
333 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 25th 2002
Occupation: Specialty Systems Manager
Location: Chesterfield, UK
If I remember correctly, that 5 year thing was in my contract with Bits Studios - but then they sacked for no reason so I ignored it and applied to other companies. :razz:
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Joe-Bob on
Mon Dec 20th 2004 at 9:40pm
Joe-Bob
member
180 posts
77 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 3rd 2004
I hate EA, but I'm not really a bandwagon hater. They may have
bought Maxis in '95, but that didn't make me hate them. It's when
they had Maxis stop making classics like SimCopter and make awful
expansion packs for the Sims.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ReNo on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 12:19am
Posted
2004-12-21 12:19am
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
I dislike EA a lot, but I'm not a hater of any other company really. I wouldn't even dislike EA if it wasn't for the fact they keep buying up independant developers and rival publishers. I'm surprised to see Ubi having such a chunk bought out, and seriously hope they don't fall under EA. They have a good reputation amongst gamers for making, as far as I can think of, original and forward thinking titles, whether you enjoy them or not. Sure we might be seeing a fair amount of sequels from them but most are worth buying. I certainly wouldn't have imagined many people would criticse Ubisoft for pumping out rubbish Gwil, they probably have one of the best line ups of games out of all publishers.
I find it sad when many of the games companies I knew as a child fall to the ever growing giants; when will they be happy with what they have?
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by gimpinthesink on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 1:30am
662 posts
176 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 21st 2002
Occupation: student
Location: Forest Town, Notts
I dislike EA for their tendency of buying up companys that try to compete with them but I do like some of their titles like Battlefield Vietnam and some of the Medal of Honour series and especially the Comand and Conquer series
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Pvt.Scythe on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 10:19am
Posted
2004-12-21 10:19am
730 posts
113 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 19th 2004
Occupation: student
Location: Finland
It's really sad what happened to Westwood. I still remember Dune II... What happened to G.O.D.(Gathering Of Developers) by the way?
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by sde on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 11:11am
Posted
2004-12-21 11:11am
80 posts
18 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 9th 2002
EA...God damn, I hate EA. The C&C series was a fantastic piece of
work, and anyone who had completed both C&C: Tiberian Dawn and
C&C: Red Alert (the original two titles, based on the same engine
and made by Westwood with no influence from EA) could see that they
tied in (storyline-wise) very well, and that there was something that -
if kept at this sort of quality - could be continued almost
indefinitely. This isn't something that I'd usually support but these
were so good that I didn't really mind. When C&C: Tiberian Sun and
Firestorm came out - by this time Westwood was being eaten by EA - the
storyline was still strong but it was a little eratic - and the game
wasn't really of the same quality as RA and Tib. Dawn. Then came
C&C: Red Alert 2.
Now, as far as a game can be judged in it's own terms, RA2 is a
middling to good piece of work...good fun, good music, lengthy single
player etc. etc... but it totally wrecked the storyline. RA2, by the
way, is after EA had bought Westwood (or at least very close). The RA2
storyline works entirely off the more obvious elements of the RA
storyline - ie. it completely ignores the tie-ins with Kane, GDI, the
Brotherhood of Nod's influence, etc.etc.. and works in a purely "Cold
War Battle" sense. It's incredibly irritating to see it ruined.
Finally, C&C: Generals - which has absolutely nothing to do with
either a Soviet vs. US scenario OR the original (and incredibly potent)
Nod vs. GDI story - comes out and grinds dirt into the memory of these
classics. Generals was by a huge extent the worst piece of work I've
ever seen from "Westwood", although by this time it was definitely just
EA. They also fired the actor who played Kane, even though he enjoyed
it so much he offered to work for free.
Idiots.
I think that EA now wants to make a Red Alert 3...I can guarantee that
this will ignore the Tiberium references made in the original storyline
just as much as RA2.
By the way, I ignored the Dune series (Emperor: Battle for Dune was by
no means a bad game) because they don't come under the C&C series,
if I remember rightly.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Dred_furst on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 11:26am
Posted
2004-12-21 11:26am
455 posts
135 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 3rd 2003
Location: UK
EA are horrible, I must admit the first two addons for the sims i was
willing to buy, but SEVEN!!! thats ludicrous, 7X20=140! ?140 for seven
addons, that is just plain cheeky, and by the end of the second, it
sucked anyway, they get a beutifully crafted game, that runs smoothly,
and turn it into an unbalanced s**tty hole of crapness for lots of
fools. because of it, im steering away from the sims 2.
I must admit Generals is nice and all, but is a huge tangent, and gives too much tension to be fun, (if your not skilled)
RA2 was nice, isometric and all, but I'd rather have something coherent,
Classics, ah yes, great stuff, shame they broke on win2k/xp... :sad:
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ribbz on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 11:29am
Posted
2004-12-21 11:29am
10 posts
1 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 9th 2004
Occupation: Sole trader
Location: UK
The only bright side is that at least they will have no decision making ability at Ubi due to the small amount of shares, plus you never know the US anti-trust might not give clearence for the deal (unless there are back handers!!)
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ben_j_davis on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 2:26pm
69 posts
27 snarkmarks
Registered:
Mar 22nd 2004
Hmm, well i was thinking about working at EA, but then i began to read at some of the stories coming out of the company about the way they treat their staff and i was like "hmm maybe not"
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ribbz on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 4:04pm
10 posts
1 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 9th 2004
Occupation: Sole trader
Location: UK
Perhaps they will get so big that they will eat their own greedy fat behind?! :biggrin:
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Dred_furst on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 4:16pm
455 posts
135 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 3rd 2003
Location: UK
I want to work at valve when im older XD
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Crono on
Tue Dec 21st 2004 at 10:09pm
Posted
2004-12-21 10:09pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Everyone is forgetting Nox. I love that
game.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Orpheus on
Wed Dec 22nd 2004 at 7:26pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
not up to reading all 4 pages but this seems about as big an issue as everyone around here crying that Wal-Marts is killing all other business. Wal-Marts is not the bad guy, look at the checkout lanes, they are always full.
i do not see how this can be harmful to the gaming industry, but i am never surprised anymore.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on
Wed Dec 22nd 2004 at 7:40pm
751 posts
393 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Game Design, LightBox Interactive
Location: Austin TX
That's an issue anywhere with a Wal-Mart. :smile: All things considered, though, their marketing strategies are pretty tame.
But to keep the analogy going... What would your opinion be of Wal-Mart if they forced 80 hour weeks on their employees, even with nothing to do sometimes? If they gained exclusive rights as the only store to sell any NFL, PGA, or Nascar merchandise and started making plans to acquire exclusive rights for sales of all NBA and (as is speculated) MLB merchandise? And if they started buying small local businesses for the sole purpose of shutting them down? Or if they bought a 20% share of Target with the intent of gutting it for only what they need and throwing everyone else out on the street?
EA is doing what makes them money, and they do that very well. They're a recognizable company with a wide range of games appealing to incredibly wide audiences. But their continued efforts in this direction are highly detrimental to the quality of games - putting employees under 80 hour work weeks mandatory with no overtime, firing employees who try to take christmas day off, and secretive 'loyalty' exercises (asking if a person would like to move to another project within the same company, and if they say yes firing them the next day) don't improve the quality of games. It results in a tired and burned out work force that cannot hope to create a quality product, and it is chasing some damn good talent out of the industry entirely because people believe that there is no better way, that it has to be this way everywhere else. Why do you think EA trying to replace its dwindling veteran talent with fresh kids straight out of high school and/or college?
I know people who have worked at EA or on a project for EA, and the horror stories I hear are a disgrace to what should be a great industry. And if they can go for Ubi, who else might they be able to go for? As an Activision employee, that is a very scary prospect!
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Orpheus on
Wed Dec 22nd 2004 at 7:47pm
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
2024 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 26th 2001
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
sighs
Andrew, if a company is abusing its employees, of course i would not like it.
still.. i am not sure about the particulars so its best i bow out.
i would like to say though, many companies abuse their people to a point.. thats just expected. but its up to the people working for them to decide which line is crossed and when.
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ReNo on
Thu Dec 23rd 2004 at 1:54pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
I hadn't read that post of yours yet Andrew and just came back to this
thread to mention the exclusive deal with the NBA. This is really
getting out of hand, I dread to think how much more they can consume
before it ends. I also read today that they are aquiring a great deal
of shares in DICE, which might not change much considering their
biggest games (Battlefield series) are already EA titles, but god knows
what will happen with their Rallisport Challenge series :sad:
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Nickelplate on
Thu Dec 23rd 2004 at 2:02pm
2770 posts
346 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 23rd 2004
Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
Location: US
I think that a LOT of EA games sucked... like ALL the sports ones, I hate sports games, whats the f**king point? Just go and actually PLAY a sport. Anyway, MOHAA et al was good although the last expansion was really buggy. Overall I wish that EA would stop with this nonsense.
on another unrelated note:
How about that snow Orph? Dang! How much did you get?
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by ReNo on
Thu Dec 23rd 2004 at 2:08pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
Yeah because everybody has the ability to just go and play Ice Hockey, or drive a NASCAR :razz:
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Dred_furst on
Thu Dec 23rd 2004 at 4:24pm
455 posts
135 snarkmarks
Registered:
Sep 3rd 2003
Location: UK
well, some of the skating games were excellent, i must admit, but not
as simulatiopn as he said, but for sheer crazyness. If it were a
simulation, it would suck imo (skating in real life doesnt suck btw)
Re: EA buys 20% (well, 19.9) stake in UbiSoft
Posted by Nickelplate on
Thu Dec 23rd 2004 at 5:20pm
2770 posts
346 snarkmarks
Registered:
Nov 23rd 2004
Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
Location: US
I just don't prefer games like skating and football and basketball. I would rather do them for real. I'd probably rather kill ppl for real too sometimes, but luckily for my enemies, i DO like those types of games!!!