[article] Clipping Vs. Carving

[article] Clipping Vs. Carving

Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Tracer Bullet on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 12:56am
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 12:56am
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
This is a discussion topic for the article "Clipping Vs. Carving" by Tracer Bullet which can be found here

Article description:

Cutting holes in things: which tool and why
Loading embedded content: Article #138
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Crono on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 1:53am
Crono
6628 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 1:53am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts 700 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2003 Location: Oregon, USA
It needed to be made.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by omegaslayer on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 2:30am
omegaslayer
2481 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 2:30am
2481 posts 595 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2004 Occupation: Sr. DevOPS Engineer Location: Seattle, WA
Yes it did with all these noob mappers asking why carving is bad? (and some other people defending it)
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by parakeet on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 2:59am
parakeet
544 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 2:59am
parakeet
member
544 posts 81 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 30th 2004 Occupation: n/a Location: Eastern US
I still wonder why they kept it in hammer editor... it makes no sense...
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by SaintGreg on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 5:39am
SaintGreg
212 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 5:39am
212 posts 51 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 3rd 2004
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by DrGlass on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 9:44am
DrGlass
1825 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 9:44am
DrGlass
member
1825 posts 632 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 12th 2004 Occupation: 2D/3D digital artist Location: USA
Thank you! I think you should have gone a little more in depth with the window example. I think that vertex manipulation and clipping go hand in hand. The last screen may bring about more questions.

Over all, this is a must know for any newbie.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Mr_noob on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 10:41am
Mr_noob
5 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 10:41am
Mr_noob
member
5 posts 11 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Wow! i didnt know how bad the carve tool was compared to clipping. I've been using carve since i started, and it gets bloody hard to see stuff in the cluttered windows. This has really helped.
But i really hate vertex manipulation, everytime i use it, it buggers up my map and creates shapes that cant exist in three dimensions.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Guessmyname on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 11:51am
Guessmyname
342 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 11:51am
342 posts 173 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 6th 2004
Like Crono said, it needed to be made. I'll post this on as many forums as I can...
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by LAzerMANiac on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 2:47pm
LAzerMANiac
204 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 2:47pm
204 posts 100 snarkmarks Registered: Sep 30th 2003 Occupation: A student/mapper for Xen Rebels Location: Fremont, CA
My idea is that carving is okay as long as you know where to use it and where to clip instead. But I agree, carving IS evil, regardless of my opinion.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Forceflow on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 3:44pm
Forceflow
2420 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 3:44pm
2420 posts 451 snarkmarks Registered: Nov 6th 2003 Occupation: Engineering Student (CS) Location: Belgium
Good job !
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by fraggard on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 4:23pm
fraggard
1110 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 4:23pm
fraggard
member
1110 posts 220 snarkmarks Registered: Jul 8th 2002 Occupation: Student Location: Bangalore, India
In the screens, it would be easier to see the actual objects if you reduce the intensity of the gridlines. (Tools > Options > 2D Views> Slider)

Besides that, good stuff.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by kdhunt2000 on Sat Jan 22nd 2005 at 6:51pm
kdhunt2000
98 posts
Posted 2005-01-22 6:51pm
98 posts 20 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 19th 2004 Location: USA
Wow, I am a newbie and it finally makes sense to me, bravo, bravo, bravo!!!!!
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Hugh on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 3:17am
Hugh
900 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 3:17am
Hugh
member
900 posts 207 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 25th 2003 Occupation: College Student Location: Amerika
Even if that was true, Ballblue, you're still an idiot. :)

Good tut, Mr. Bullet.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Drshark on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 6:18am
Drshark
42 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 6:18am
Drshark
member
42 posts 24 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 22nd 2005
Wuhhu.... now i a?can make a REAL map.... THX MAN!!!!
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by ReNo on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 3:37pm
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 3:37pm
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
Ok Ballblue, you could technically make that out of 8 solids, but chances are it would actually use the same number of polys. Faces that are coplanar and share the same texture alignment are combined into one.

Even if it did by chance reduce the polycount slightly, for the 2 or 4 or whatever w_poly you saved, I wouldn't say it would be worth the more awkward to manipulate brush layout.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by G.Ballblue on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 4:08pm
G.Ballblue
1511 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 4:08pm
1511 posts 211 snarkmarks Registered: May 16th 2004 Occupation: Student Location: A secret Nuclear Bunker on Mars
Er. the sad thing is, I can probably make a cylindric hole in the wall with less polies than either of your shown screens <.<
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Grash on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 9:54pm
Grash
32 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 9:54pm
Grash
member
32 posts 43 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 5th 2005 Occupation: Developer Location: USA
The Carve tool isn't evil, you just need to use it like you explained and with some common sense [i.e. like not using torus to carve with :) ]
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by parakeet on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 10:35pm
parakeet
544 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 10:35pm
parakeet
member
544 posts 81 snarkmarks Registered: Apr 30th 2004 Occupation: n/a Location: Eastern US
Yes an maybe carving water, As it kinda just turns into water after compile (dont quote me on this = P) Carving is mostly inneficient and causes more errors than it prevents <- Quote me on this = P
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Tracer Bullet on Sun Jan 23rd 2005 at 11:08pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2005-01-23 11:08pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
I chose "evil" as an obvious exaggeration. Let me rephrase. There is NO situation in which carving is superior to clipping. Clipping is faster and gives better results. If you choose to argue the point, you are wrong.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 1:26am
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 1:26am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Sad isn't it, when we are compelled to make tutorials on subjects most people should be smart enough to figure out by themselves.

the results of carving are so dramatic, even when you use it the first time.

carving is evil.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by ReNo on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 2:42am
ReNo
5457 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 2:42am
ReNo
member
5457 posts 1991 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 22nd 2001 Occupation: Level Designer Location: Scotland
Clipping gives better results and is almost always the best way to do things, but saying its faster is sorta lying Tracer :P
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Tracer Bullet on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 7:51am
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 7:51am
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
I don't know about that ReNo. If you look at it there are about the same number of steps involved. Maybe I just find carving slower because I had to sort of figure out how to do it again for the tutorial :P

It is sort of sad the this is needed, however it should speed the learning process. I know I used carving allot in my early days, simply because most "first map" tuts make extensive use of both the hollow and carve tools. I decided on my own that both tools were more trouble than they were worth, but it took me a lot longer than it would have if a tutorial like this had existed.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by motionblurrr on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 5:55pm
motionblurrr
44 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 5:55pm
44 posts 14 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 7th 2004
First of all, great tutorial! I love the clip tool... it has saved my life on many occasions (in a manner of speaking). I only wish I realized its full potential several months ago.

But to Parakeet, I hope you're joking about wishing the carve tool be removed. You can't do some things with the clipping tool that you can do with carve. Don't get me wrong, I RARELY ever use the carve tool, but it does have it's place.

For example, I wanted to make a 32 faceted hollow cone to connect to a 32 faceted hollow cylinder (seemlessly) and there is no way you could do this with the clip tool and the "make hollow" command would always produce uneven seems. So I created the first cone, cloned it and downsized it on all three axis (by 16 units) and then positioned it inside of the other larger cone and carved away.

Now, for those of you who think I'm crazy, you should know that the cone and cylinder brushes exists in an area of my map where nothing else is visible, they are both func_illusionary, and have a basic rectangle surrounding them to seperate them from the void.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Tracer Bullet on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 7:48pm
Tracer Bullet
2271 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 7:48pm
2271 posts 445 snarkmarks Registered: May 22nd 2003 Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D) Location: Seattle WA, USA
For making funky hollow shapes, you ought to have a look at this tut:http://www.snarkpit.com/editing.php?page=tutorials&game=HL&id=27

No carving needed.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by HrnyGoat on Mon Jan 24th 2005 at 9:30pm
HrnyGoat
8 posts
Posted 2005-01-24 9:30pm
HrnyGoat
member
8 posts 31 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 24th 2005 Occupation: student Location: USA
A good method, but i still prefer carving for most things. its quick and dirty, but you can always manipulate the individual brushes if you dont get the result you want.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Orpheus on Thu Jan 27th 2005 at 12:58am
Orpheus
13860 posts
Posted 2005-01-27 12:58am
Orpheus
member
13860 posts 2024 snarkmarks Registered: Aug 26th 2001 Occupation: Long Haul Trucking Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Don't it just burn your ass, when someone ruins the premise of an idea?

insert eyeroll here
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Ladybulf on Thu Jan 27th 2005 at 12:39pm
Ladybulf
3 posts
Posted 2005-01-27 12:39pm
Ladybulf
member
3 posts 0 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 20th 2005 Occupation: Artisan Location: Scotland
I've found that in order not to 'lock up hammer' when carving is to create the objects, copy and paste them into a new blank map, do the carving there and then reimport them into the original map, line them up over the pre-existing objects and them those.
making good use of the group/ungroup toggle and func_detail.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by Degenatron on Thu Jan 27th 2005 at 3:38pm
Degenatron
64 posts
Posted 2005-01-27 3:38pm
64 posts 1336 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 7th 2004 Occupation: IT Professional Location: USA
A very good tut for new mappers.

However, there are times when using carve can be useful AND produce usable results (gasp! Mapper Blasphamy!).

The rule of thumb is "keep it simple".

For example, you are making a banister for a staircase and it's at a funky angle that doen't match the pre-made textures. You've had to rotate the handrail of the banister into place to match the decent angle of the stairs. You then put in a series of thin vertical brushes for the supports that enter into the underside of the handrail.

You can highlight just the handrail, and the supports, and hide everything else. Now select the handrail only. Press the carve button. The tops of the supports will be clipped to line up with the handrail. Unhide everything (and kill the vis-group created).

The "keep it simple" rule of thumb sums up these more complex rules:

-Do your carving in place (with all brushes already placed in the map) and don't try to move carve pieces around (unless you have a handle that lines up to the grid). Always hide everything else that is not carving or being carved.

-NEVER carve INTO another brush. If you are going to make any kind of cavity in a brush, ALWAYS use the clip tool as shown above. Carving is ONLY good for cutting off the end of the target brush and having that brush line up with the carving brush. Always make sure the brush doing the carving is bigger than the brush being carved.

-Only use ONE face to carve another brush. Do not attempt to carve a brush with more than one face of the carving brush. Helter-skelter cut lines will result if you break this rule.

-Carve with only simple shapes. Carving with squares and rectagles is best. In a pinch you CAN carve with a vertex manipulated brush, but ONLY use it to carve a brush with straight, perpedicular lines. The extreme envelope edge in this rule would be to use a vertex manipulated brush to carve a wierd angle on a cylinder. NOT a good idea though.

-Always carve with one brush. If the staircase from the example had been a curving staircase, you'd have had to do each section of the handrail at a time. Selecting an entire set of brushes and then carving with them is bad because each face, on every brush, projects a "plane of cutting" through space and can easily cut into a brush that doesn't actually touch the brush which caused the cut.

Confused?

Just remeber to keep it simple and that 98 times out of a 100, clipping is the better choice, but every once in a while a carve, done right, can save you some time.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by sabrewolf on Fri Jan 28th 2005 at 8:46pm
sabrewolf
3 posts
Posted 2005-01-28 8:46pm
3 posts 0 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 28th 2005 Location: Belgium
Good tut , but carving can save you some time .Simple example :
connecting two rooms with a straight corridor; carv the 2 rooms with the ( too long ) corridor brush ; make the brush at length ; make hollow outside ; delete the 2 ends ; done .
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by StickFigs on Wed Mar 9th 2005 at 2:35am
StickFigs
28 posts
Posted 2005-03-09 2:35am
28 posts 13 snarkmarks Registered: Dec 23rd 2004
Carve out a block then carve the cylinder out of the block shape. How to carve like a pro.
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by RadBrad on Tue Mar 15th 2005 at 5:35am
RadBrad
5 posts
Posted 2005-03-15 5:35am
RadBrad
member
5 posts 1 snarkmarks Registered: Oct 7th 2003
Shift+x to change the clipping options OR click the clip tool icon until you reach what you like (add, subtract, or cut).
Re: [article] Clipping Vs. Carving Posted by jameske on Fri Jan 6th 2006 at 10:14am
jameske
1 post
Posted 2006-01-06 10:14am
jameske
member
1 post 0 snarkmarks Registered: Jan 6th 2006
It was a good tutorial, but it doesn't say how you clipped the round window.