Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Cassius on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 4:50am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
I've been playing it all day now - so far it's been a disgrace. The graphics and level design are terrible (literally two or three colors here folks), a step down from Halo 1 in most respects, the menu screens and vehicle physics are laughable, and the storyline isn't making any sense at all. Completely absent is the great flow of the vehicle physics that made Halo 1 enjoyable (the ghost is pathetically jittery); it appears to have left along with the innovative level design and lush, albeit low polygon, feel of the game. Instead, we are treated to the 'graphical upgrades' of poor bump mapping (really only helps on the character models) and blurred backgrounds during cinematics.
(yes, I do think this warrants its own thread)
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by ReNo on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 5:00am
ReNo
member
5457 posts
1991 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Occupation: Level Designer
Location: Scotland
Hmm, I don't, its blatantly the same topic as the other Halo 2 thread.
Ah well this has put a slight dampener on my excitement for it, but I'll probably still really enjoy it. We'll see...
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Cassius on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 6:36am
Cassius
member
1989 posts
238 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 24th 2001
Update: the first level sucks, the rest is pretty okay.
For some reason, the cutscenes with the Master Chief/other humans are really terrible, whereas the ones with the Covenant are quite excellent. I've gotten to the first big, open terrain level - truly, not as impressive or lush as Halo 1's first level was in terms of terrain (just with higher resolution textures and a pretty snazzy new water rendering system) but not too terrible. The Covenant/Halo installation architecture seems to have lost some of its style and slickness.
The physics system, however, appears to be the victim of a brutal rape. I have no idea why Bungie chose to do this. I would rather play a Halo sequel on the same engine than have them sacrifice key parts of the game for unnecessary graphical features.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Finger on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 7:15am
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
Well, I have only just started playing it, and I feel about the same way, Cass. It feels less polished and cohesive, than Halo1. The bump mapping, where applied, just seems wrong, especially on character faces. The story didn't grab me from the start; sofar, I just feel like I am kind of going from 1 random objective to another. I have only just begun to play, so I am hoping it balances out a little. It's really ashame, and I feel sort of bad for Bungie. Seems they tried to stretch the xbox too far, hit some walls, made some cuts and visual sacrifices, and just couldn't bounce back with the polish of the first game (pun intended).
They did, however, do a kick ass job of supporting multiplayer, Xbox live and the ranking systems of players. You can log onto their hub, and view the top players, look at their past games, see all the statistics you could think of (where they capped flags, who they killed, where and with what weapon). All of this represented visually, on the maps. I think I even heard a coworker state that you could go back and watch the games of top players (I'll have to confirm this).
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by NotLagur2 on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 7:39pm
26 posts
3 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 31st 2004
For once Cas, I agree with you. Halo 2 does suck
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 7:39pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
I have been playing Halo 2 also since yesterday. The multiplayer if fun but the single player is dissapointing. The first Halo had a much better campaign. The story line is good and cutscenes are great for both covenent and humans. The graphics do push the Xbox to its limits which causes a few graphical glitches. There is no lag at all through out the entire game. Even on Blood Gulch with 16 people and vehicles and explosions everywhere the game still runs at a smooth 60 fps. There are many changes to the game which I did not like. THe new hud is hard to view and there are no health bars. The graphics are better but some things look a little wierd. I think the overused the bump mapping in the game and the texturing on the models actually looks worse. Everything in your view is closer which means you have worse peripheral vision. The plasma rifle sounds awesome and you can drive all the vehicles. The warthog feels different when driving it. I wish they kept the old HUD and kept the first person view when in the passenger seat of the warthog. THe bansion and scorpion tank move a lot slower. THe rocket launcher has a heat seeking mode. The pistol which was probably the best weapon in Halo is now a peice of crap in this game. The new kick ass weapon is the double SMGs and the elites sword. There is a basic summary of the game. The multiplayer is more friendly to newer people so people who want a real challenge will probably stick with Halo on comp. I enjoy the online play but would much rather play Halo's campaign.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Crono on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 7:48pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Taking that the game is being shown on your TV how the f**k can you possibly notice anything above 30Hz (seeing as you claim it's doubling refresh speed)?
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Spartan on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 8:59pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
I don't know how they did it but it runs a lot smoother than the first Halo. Online play is just as smooth as single player.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Crono on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 9:01pm
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
That has nothing to do with the animation's speed though.
They probably took time to optimize net code this time through.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Adam Hawkins on
Wed Nov 10th 2004 at 10:08pm
Posted
2004-11-10 10:08pm
858 posts
333 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 25th 2002
Occupation: Specialty Systems Manager
Location: Chesterfield, UK
I was never a big fan of the original Halo - I found it a little too simplistic gameplay wise, but it was by no means bad. If the sequel is more of the same then i'm sure it's a perfectly playable game (and by that I mean one that I would stick through till the end and have a bit of fun along the way). I just won't be buying it until it's re-released on the Xbox budget label (not sure what it's called!).
I think part of the problem some of you may be having, and I have too - is that you've all spent time editing for games and it makes you a much harsher critic than the average gameplayer. I've only recently started to enjoy playing games again over the last 6 months or so and that's simply because i've been trying to stop myself from looking for mis-aligned textures, or AI glitches etc.
Every review i've read of Halo 2 has given it a great rating, so they can't all be too far off the mark...
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by omegaslayer on
Fri Nov 12th 2004 at 2:17am
2481 posts
595 snarkmarks
Registered:
Jan 16th 2004
Occupation: Sr. DevOPS Engineer
Location: Seattle, WA
I agree there are problems with the game, mainly the levels, I enjoy the gameplay and such, but the levels are confined and full of physics obeying objects that dont add to the game, but take away from it. And there are two questions I have:
Where the hell is that demo level that we all saw?
And If you completed the game. WHAT THE HELL!!!! this is just like the 2nd matrix move, ends in a cliff-hanger. WTF?
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Spartan on
Fri Nov 12th 2004 at 11:10pm
Posted
2004-11-12 11:10pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
Well just beat the game and I can say it was wonderful. I began the game with dissapointment but ended it with a smile. There will definatly be a Halo 3 coming out. The story is great, the cinematics are great, the music is awesome and gives you that whole grand sceme feeling, the level design in the later levels is the best I have ever seen. The online multiplayer is fun. Now Halo 2 it isn't without its flaws but these can be overlooked. There are a few graphical glitches due to the Xbox being pushed to its limits, but they did a wonderful job keeping it running smooth. I noticed some AI problems but only on occasion. The vehicles and hud have been changed a little bit but they would've been better keeping them the way they were in Halo.
The story is great and is full of plot twists and unexpected events. I suggest either buying the game now if you have an Xbox or waiting for the comp version to avoid the graphical glitches. The first Halo was $50 for two years so this won't one be going down in price anytime soon.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by scary_jeff on
Sat Nov 13th 2004 at 10:24am
Posted
2004-11-13 10:24am
1614 posts
191 snarkmarks
Registered:
Aug 22nd 2001
Multiplayer CTF level where they were on a section of beach playing around with buggies and those flying things, recorded from the presentation where they announced the launch date and that idiot had it tatooed on his arm. I saw the same level on the trailer I think.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Spartan on
Sat Nov 13th 2004 at 6:20pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
It might be a downloadable level later on.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Finger on
Sat Nov 13th 2004 at 10:31pm
Posted
2004-11-13 10:31pm
Finger
member
672 posts
1460 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 13th 2001
I guess I'm about halfway through it, right now, and have a whole new impression of the game now. Once I got to the city, and got ahold of some vehicles, it became VERY fun. The vehicles are a treat, I am especially fond of ghosts and wraiths (mmm..shooting banshees out of the sky with a Wraith you just jacked). Enemy A.I. is also very impressive.
I am still bugged by the bump mapping on some characters faces, and the detail popping during cut-scenes, but the solid gameplay and dynamic environments makes those gripes miniscule.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Yak_Fighter on
Sun Nov 14th 2004 at 6:00am
1832 posts
742 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 30th 2001
Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Yes, but you're assuming it will actually run at 30fps, which wasn't the case in my experience. I had to run at 800x600 with all the detail turned down to get that, and guess what? On the same computer I can run CSS at 800x600 with some detail and get more than 30fps.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Crono on
Sun Nov 14th 2004 at 7:37am
Crono
super admin
6628 posts
700 snarkmarks
Registered:
Dec 19th 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
That's not the issue they were bitching about though. I didn't say it was excelent or anything, it still has many many faults. It's just the modeling frame limit isn't really one of them.
It doesn't run well on my computer either, so, I know what you're talking about. I doubt they translated all the code properly. They probably just emulated Xbox software and ran it on that. That would be the easiest thing to do, anyway.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by Spartan on
Sun Nov 14th 2004 at 4:58pm
Spartan
member
1204 posts
409 snarkmarks
Registered:
Apr 28th 2004
I don't know what your all talking about. Halo runs fine on my super computer that I purchased from MIT.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by pepper on
Sun Nov 14th 2004 at 5:13pm
pepper
member
597 posts
80 snarkmarks
Registered:
Feb 25th 2004
Location: holland
i never liked halo, i played the demo and thaught the game was crap, il never buy it.
Re: Halo 2:
Posted by snagraz_x on
Wed Nov 17th 2004 at 11:18am
Posted
2004-11-17 11:18am
8 posts
1 snarkmarks
Registered:
Oct 14th 2004
Location: England
Yeah i know, everyone thinks Halo 2 is great and everything, and they say HL2 is crap. Out of the competition between HL2, San Andreas and Halo 2, I think that Half-life two is definetly the best.